Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621073›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

Conscious perception and the modulatory role of dopamine: no effect of the dopamine D2 agonist cabergoline on visual masking, the attentional blink, and probabilistic discrimination.

E A Boonstra, M R van Schouwenburg, A K Seth, M Bauer, J B Zantvoord, E M Kemper, C S Lansink, H A Slagter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E A BoonstraDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA) Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands. evertboonstra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-4088
M R van SchouwenburgDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
A K SethDepartment of Informatics Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK.
M BauerSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
J B ZantvoordDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Bascule, Academic Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
E M KemperDepartment of Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C S LansinkSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
H A SlagterDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA) Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council ERC-2015-STG-679399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleConscious perception is thought to depend on global amplification of sensory input. In recent years, striatal dopamine has been proposed to be involved in gating information and conscious access, due to its modulatory influence on thalamocortical connectivity.

objectivesSince much of the evidence that implicates striatal dopamine is correlational, we conducted a double-blind crossover pharmacological study in which we administered cabergoline-a dopamine D2 agonist-and placebo to 30 healthy participants. Under both conditions, we subjected participants to several well-established experimental conscious-perception paradigms, such as backward masking and the attentional blink task.

resultsWe found no evidence in support of an effect of cabergoline on conscious perception: key behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) findings associated with each of these tasks were unaffected by cabergoline.

conclusionsOur results cast doubt on a causal role for dopamine in visual perception. It remains an open possibility that dopamine has causal effects in other tasks, perhaps where perceptual uncertainty is more prominent.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentional BlinkCabergolineConsciousnessCorpus StriatumCross-Over StudiesDiscrimination LearningDopamine AgonistsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReceptors, Dopamine D2Visual PerceptionCabergolineDopamine AgonistsReceptors, Dopamine D2Attentional blinkBackward maskingBasal gangliaCabergolineConsciousnessDopamineEEGEvent-related potentialSpontaneous eye blink rateStriatum

Identifiers

PMID32621073
PMCPMC7501106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.