Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621072›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Clinical Learning, Didactic Education, and Research Experiences of Radiation Oncology Resident Physicians in Canada.

Michael H Wang, Shaun K Loewen, Meredith Giuliani, Alysa Fairchild, Don Yee, Brock J Debenham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Successful implementation of online educational lectures of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  5. Do Radiation Oncology Residents Have a Preferred Radiation Treatment Planning Review Format?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael H WangDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. michael.wang@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-8601
Shaun K LoewenDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alysa FairchildDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Don YeeDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Brock J DebenhamDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in the field of radiation oncology (RO) impacts residency training. Assessing trainee experiences is essential to inform curriculum development. We aim to explore gaps and strengths in current Canadian RO training, as we move towards competency-based medical education (CBME). An online survey was distributed to residents at all Canadian RO training programs. Surveys consisted of 66 open-ended, Likert-scale, matrix-style, and multiple-choice questions, and assessed clinical exposure, didactic teaching, professional relationships, and research experiences. Statistics were calculated from anonymized, aggregate responses. Out of 128 eligible residents, 53 responded (41% response rate). Of these, 57% were male, and 77% were Canadian medical graduates. Senior residents (PGY-4 to PGY-5) perceived insufficient exposure to lymphoma and ocular malignancies, brachytherapy for breast and esophagus malignancies, and stereotactic radiotherapy of the pancreas, prostate, and adrenal gland. Half (51%) had training on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) challenges, and 43% had a formal staff mentor. Most residents presented at least one research project at conferences (77%) and authored ≥ 1 publications (66%) during residency. Canadian RO residents are satisfied with their clinical training and educational experience in high-volume tumor sites and high-volume brachytherapy procedures. Areas identified for potential improvement are (1) low-volume tumor sites; (2) low-volume brachytherapy procedures; (3) low-volume stereotactic radiotherapy sites; (4) IGRT challenges; and (5) mentorship opportunities. These findings will inform future CBME curriculum revisions.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansRadiation OncologyCanadaCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical educationMentorshipRadiation oncologyResidency trainingResident research

Identifiers

PMID32621072
OpenAlexW3039053440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.