Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621068›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

A mapping study of ensemble classification methods in lung cancer decision support systems.

Mohamed Hosni, Ginés García-Mateos, Juan M Carrillo-de-Gea, Ali Idri, José Luis Fernández-Alemán

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Computer Based Diagnosis of Some Chronic Diseases: A Medical Journey of the Last Two Decades.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed HosniSoftware Project Management Research Team, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-4276
Ginés García-MateosDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. ginesgm@um.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-4454
Juan M Carrillo-de-GeaDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-622X
Ali IdriSoftware Project Management Research Team, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4586-4158
José Luis Fernández-AlemánDepartment of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-450X

Funding

European Commission Erasmus+ International Mobility Program (KA107)Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades RTI2018-098156-B-C53Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades RTI2018-098309-B-C33Moroccan MESRSFC and CNRST MPHR- PPR1/09-2015-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving a high level of classification accuracy in medical datasets is a capital need for researchers to provide effective decision systems to assist doctors in work. In many domains of artificial intelligence, ensemble classification methods are able to improve the performance of single classifiers. This paper reports the state of the art of ensemble classification methods in lung cancer detection. We have performed a systematic mapping study to identify the most interesting papers concerning this topic. A total of 65 papers published between 2000 and 2018 were selected after an automatic search in four digital libraries and a careful selection process. As a result, it was observed that diagnosis was the task most commonly studied; homogeneous ensembles and decision trees were the most frequently adopted for constructing ensembles; and the majority voting rule was the predominant combination rule. Few studies considered the parameter tuning of the techniques used. These findings open several perspectives for researchers to enhance lung cancer research by addressing the identified gaps, such as investigating different classification methods, proposing other heterogeneous ensemble methods, and using new combination rules. Graphical abstract Main features of the mapping study performed in ensemble classification methods applied on lung cancer decision support systems.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalLung NeoplasmsBibliometricsDatabases, FactualDecision Making, Computer-AssistedDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningSoftwareSupport Vector MachineClassificationDecision support systemsEnsemble methodsLung cancerMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.