ArticlePlanta2020
Differential responses of sorghum genotypes to sugarcane aphid feeding.
Article in Planta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Niche differentiation of two sorghum aphid species: Host leaf ontogeny drives divergent feeding behavior and fitness.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Detecting sorghum aphid infestation in grain sorghum using leaf spectral response.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Combining transcriptome and metabolome analysis to understand the response of sorghum to Melanaphis sacchari.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of A3 cytoplasmic male sterile forage sorghum lines for resistance to sugarcane aphid.Planta · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that known resistant sorghum genotypes compensate for feeding pressure of sugarcane aphid by maintaining/increasing photosynthetic capacity and/or have higher chlorophyll content than susceptible genotypes. Knowledge of the physiological response of sorghum, (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), to sugarcane aphid (SCA), Melanaphis sacchari (Zehnter) feeding will provide baseline information on defense responses and resistance mechanisms. This study documented the impact of SCA feeding on seven sorghum genotypes by measuring chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and carbon assimilation for a 14-d post-infestation evaluation. Carbon assimilation (A/Ci) curves were recorded at 3, 6, 9, and 15 d after aphid infestation to describe the pattern of physiological response of resistant and susceptible sorghums over time. Chlorophyll loss from resistant genotypes was significantly lower (≤ 10% loss) than from susceptible cultivars. Most resistant genotypes compensated for aphid feeding by either increasing or maintaining photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance. Carbon assimilation curves over time showed that infested resistant plants had delayed photosynthetic decreases, whereas susceptible plants rapidly lost photosynthetic capacity. This research also investigated the influence of aphid density (0, 50, 100, and 200 nymphs/plant) on the photosynthetic rates of 28-d-old resistant and susceptible sorghums measured at 72-h post-infestation. Although there were no visual symptoms in susceptible sorghums, photosynthetic rates were impaired when infested with ≥ 100 SCA. In contrast, resistant plants were able to compensate for SCA feeding. Differences in the physiological responses of susceptible versus resistant sorghums indicate that resistant sorghum plants can tolerate some physiological impacts of SCA feeding and maintain photosynthetic integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.