Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621008›Full record

ArticlePlanta2020

Differential responses of sorghum genotypes to sugarcane aphid feeding.

Sulochana Paudyal, J Scott Armstrong, Kristopher L Giles, Wyatt Hoback, Robert Aiken, Mark E Payton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sulochana PaudyalDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA. sulochanapaudyal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-8542
J Scott ArmstrongWheat, Peanut and Other Field Crops Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 1301 N Western Street, Stillwater, OK, 74075, USA.
Kristopher L GilesDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Wyatt HobackDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Robert AikenNorthwest Research-Extension Center, 105 Experiment Farm Road, P.O. Box 505, Colby, KS, 67701, USA.
Mark E PaytonDepartment of Statistics, Oklahoma State University, 301 MSCS Building, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that known resistant sorghum genotypes compensate for feeding pressure of sugarcane aphid by maintaining/increasing photosynthetic capacity and/or have higher chlorophyll content than susceptible genotypes. Knowledge of the physiological response of sorghum, (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), to sugarcane aphid (SCA), Melanaphis sacchari (Zehnter) feeding will provide baseline information on defense responses and resistance mechanisms. This study documented the impact of SCA feeding on seven sorghum genotypes by measuring chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and carbon assimilation for a 14-d post-infestation evaluation. Carbon assimilation (A/Ci) curves were recorded at 3, 6, 9, and 15 d after aphid infestation to describe the pattern of physiological response of resistant and susceptible sorghums over time. Chlorophyll loss from resistant genotypes was significantly lower (≤ 10% loss) than from susceptible cultivars. Most resistant genotypes compensated for aphid feeding by either increasing or maintaining photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance. Carbon assimilation curves over time showed that infested resistant plants had delayed photosynthetic decreases, whereas susceptible plants rapidly lost photosynthetic capacity. This research also investigated the influence of aphid density (0, 50, 100, and 200 nymphs/plant) on the photosynthetic rates of 28-d-old resistant and susceptible sorghums measured at 72-h post-infestation. Although there were no visual symptoms in susceptible sorghums, photosynthetic rates were impaired when infested with ≥ 100 SCA. In contrast, resistant plants were able to compensate for SCA feeding. Differences in the physiological responses of susceptible versus resistant sorghums indicate that resistant sorghum plants can tolerate some physiological impacts of SCA feeding and maintain photosynthetic integrity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAphidsCarbon DioxideChlorophyllGenotypePhotosynthesisPopulation DensitySorghumCarbon DioxideChlorophyllGrain sorghumHemipteraPiercing-sucking injuryPlant response

Identifiers

PMID32621008
OpenAlexW3039704876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.