Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620950›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Characterizing outpatient problem list completeness and duplications in the electronic health record.

Edward Chia-Heng Wang, Adam Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A framework for understanding selection bias in real-world healthcare data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2024
    Article
  9. Impact of electronic medical record utilization on obesity screening and intervention for obese patients with endometrial cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Indication alerts to improve problem list documentation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward Chia-Heng WangDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adam WrightDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Quality by Maintaining Accurate Problem Lists in the EHR (IQ-MAPLE)R01HL122225 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WRIGHT, ADAM T · 2014 to 2017
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to characterize rates of problem list completeness and duplications in common chronic diseases and to identify any relationships that they may have with respect to disease type, demographics, and disease severity. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data from Partners HealthCare. We selected 8 common chronic diseases and identified patients with each of those diseases. We then analyzed each patient's problem list for completeness and duplications and also collected information regarding demographics and disease severity. Rates of completeness and duplications were calculated for each disease and compared according to disease type, demographics, and disease severity.

resultsA total of 327 695 unique patients and 383 404 problem list entries were identified. Problem list completeness varied from 72.9% in hypertension to 93.5% in asthma, whereas problem list duplications varied from 4.8% in hypertension to 28.2% in diabetes. There was a variable relationship between demographic factors and rates of completeness and duplication. Rates of completeness were positively correlated with disease severity for most diseases. Rates of duplication were consistently positively correlated with disease severity.

conclusionsIncompleteness and duplications are both important issues in problem lists. These issues vary widely across different diseases and can also be impacted by patient demographics and disease severity. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of individual user behaviors and organizational policies on problem list utilization, which will aid the development of interventions that improve the utility of problem lists.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMedical Records, Problem-OrientedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleOutpatientsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Indexelectronic health recordselectronic medical recordsproblem lists

Identifiers

PMID32620950
PMCPMC7481031
OpenAlexW3040615780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.