ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020
Fold-stratified cross-validation for unbiased and privacy-preserving federated learning.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of Social Media Data to Diagnose and Monitor Psychotic Disorders: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Structured multi-domain EEG descriptors with phase-based connectivity for lie and truth detection.MethodsX · 2026Article
- TRIAGE: Trustworthy Reporting and Assessment for Clinical Gain and Effectiveness of AI Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and Internal Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Identifying Burnout Syndrome Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- A clustering-stratified cross-validation framework for validating omics survival models: application to head and neck cancer.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Predicting ICU Readmission in Patients With Cerebral Infarction: A Machine Learning Approach Using Neurophysiological and Clinical Data.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- From Preliminary Urinalysis to Decision Support: Machine Learning for UTI Prediction in Real-World Laboratory Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Value of Bioinformatics Models for Predicting Translational Control of Angiogenesis.Circulation research · 2025Review
- A multimodal deep learning radiomics model for predicting degenerative meniscus tear after arthroscopy.PloS one · 2025Article
- Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration.European radiology · 2024Article
- Recent methodological advances in federated learning for healthcare.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Collaborative and privacy-enhancing workflows on a clinical data warehouse: an example developing natural language processing pipelines to detect medical conditions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Article
- To predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) using Generalized Additive2 Models (GA2M).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Federated Learning in Health care Using Structured Medical Data.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2023Review
- Article
- Patchless Multi-Stage Transfer Learning for Improved Mammographic Breast Mass Classification.Cancers · 2022Article
- A Novel Multistage Transfer Learning for Ultrasound Breast Cancer Image Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe introduce fold-stratified cross-validation, a validation methodology that is compatible with privacy-preserving federated learning and that prevents data leakage caused by duplicates of electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND
methodsFold-stratified cross-validation complements cross-validation with an initial stratification of EHRs in folds containing patients with similar characteristics, thus ensuring that duplicates of a record are jointly present either in training or in validation folds. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to investigate the properties of fold-stratified cross-validation in the case of a model data analysis using both synthetic data and MIMIC-III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III) medical records.
resultsIn situations in which duplicated EHRs could induce overoptimistic estimations of accuracy, applying fold-stratified cross-validation prevented this bias, while not requiring full deduplication. However, a pessimistic bias might appear if the covariate used for the stratification was strongly associated with the outcome. DISCUSSION: Although fold-stratified cross-validation presents low computational overhead, to be efficient it requires the preliminary identification of a covariate that is both shared by duplicated records and weakly associated with the outcome. When available, the hash of a personal identifier or a patient's date of birth provides such a covariate. On the contrary, pseudonymization interferes with fold-stratified cross-validation, as it may break the equality of the stratifying covariate among duplicates.
conclusionFold-stratified cross-validation is an easy-to-implement methodology that prevents data leakage when a model is trained on distributed EHRs that contain duplicates, while preserving privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.