Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620938›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Resting state functional connectivity of the pain matrix and default mode network in irritable bowel syndrome: a graph theoretical analysis.

Michiko Kano, Cecilia Grinsvall, Qian Ran, Patrick Dupont, Joe Morishita, Tomohiko Muratsubaki, Shunji Mugikura, Huynh Giao Ly, Hans Törnblom, Maria Ljungberg and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Functional brain neuroimaging as a tool to study gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with Parkinson's disease.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michiko KanoSukawa clinic, Kirari health coop, Fukushima, Japan. mkano@med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Cecilia GrinsvallDepartment of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Qian RanLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick DupontLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joe MorishitaBehavioral Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tomohiko MuratsubakiBehavioral Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shunji MugikuraDiagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Huynh Giao LyLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans TörnblomDepartment of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maria LjungbergDepartment of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8991-2353
Kei TakaseDiagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Magnus SimrénDepartment of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lukas Van OudenhoveLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Shin FukudoBehavioral Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Gothenburg · SETohoku University Hospital · JPDartmouth College · USSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disorder of brain-gut interactions. Differential brain responses to rectal distention between IBS and healthy controls (HCs) have been demonstrated, particularly in the pain matrix and the default mode network. This study aims to compare resting-state functional properties of these networks between IBS patients and HCs using graph analysis in two independent cohorts. We used a weighted graph analysis of the adjacency matrix based on partial correlations between time series in the different regions in each subject to determine subject specific graph measures. These graph measures were normalized by values obtained in equivalent random networks. We did not find any significant differences between IBS patients and controls in global normalized graph measures, hubs, or modularity structure of the pain matrix and the DMN in any of our two independent cohorts. Furthermore, we did not find consistent associations between these global network measures and IBS symptom severity or GI-specific anxiety but we found a significant difference in the relationship between measures of psychological distress (anxiety and/or depressive symptoms) and normalized characteristic path length. The responses of these networks to visceral stimulation rather than their organisation at rest may be primarily disturbed in IBS.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesConnectomeFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePainRestYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32620938
PMCPMC7335204
OpenAlexW3039098091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.