Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620918›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Receptor conversion in metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 390 cases from a single institution.

Rong Chen, Morad Qarmali, Gene P Siegal, Shi Wei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rong ChenDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Morad QarmaliDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Gene P SiegalDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-3368
Shi WeiDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. swei@uabmc.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status provide clinical utility in guiding therapeutic decision-making in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Increasing data have shown substantial differences between the receptor profiles of primary BCs and their paired metastases. In this study, we provide a large single center cohort to assess the frequency of receptor conversion in metastatic BC. The overall discordant rates were 18.3%, 40.3%, and 13.7% for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. The discordance was significantly higher for PR when compared with ER and HER2. The conversion occurred significantly as a switch from positive to negative receptor status when compared with that from negative to positive for all three receptors. Semiquantitative analyses revealed a significantly decreased expression of both ER (25%) and PR (57%) in the metastases. There was a higher rate of PR discordance in bone metastases when comparing to other common organs of relapse. Furthermore, in the subset of patients with a single primary and multiple distant metastases, the discordant rates among the distant sites were 27.5%, 39.4%, and 14.3% for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. A positive ER status, be it in primary or metastatic BC, was associated with a prolonged metastasis-free survival when compared with ER-negative primary tumors without conversion. Furthermore, a positive ER status in metastatic BC regardless of primary was associated with a superior overall survival when compared with an ER-negative tumor without conversion. Thus, receptor conversion is a frequent event in the course of BC progression, and can also be seen between different metastatic sites. Moreover, some conversions are of prognostic significance. The findings may reflect tumor heterogeneity, sampling or treatment effect, but may also indicate alteration in tumor biology. Repeat biomarker testing is warranted in making appropriate treatment plans in the pursuit of precision medicine.

Indexed as

AlabamaBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPhenotypePrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID32620918
OpenAlexW3038530818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.