Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620908›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Functional and transcriptional characterization of complex neuronal co-cultures.

Heather A Enright, Doris Lam, Aimy Sebastian, Ana Paula Sales, Jose Cadena, Nicholas R Hum, Joanne J Osburn, Sandra K G Peters, Bryan Petkus, David A Soscia and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather A EnrightPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA. enright3@llnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-0481
Doris LamPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-9514
Aimy SebastianPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Ana Paula SalesEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Jose CadenaEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Nicholas R HumPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-3193
Joanne J OsburnPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Sandra K G PetersPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Bryan PetkusPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
David A SosciaEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-4463
Kristen S KulpPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Gabriela G LootsPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Elizabeth K WheelerEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Nicholas O FischerPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA. fischer29@llnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-4390
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-on-a-chip systems are designed to simulate brain activity using traditional in vitro cell culture on an engineered platform. It is a noninvasive tool to screen new drugs, evaluate toxicants, and elucidate disease mechanisms. However, successful recapitulation of brain function on these systems is dependent on the complexity of the cell culture. In this study, we increased cellular complexity of traditional (simple) neuronal cultures by co-culturing with astrocytes and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (complex culture). We evaluated and compared neuronal activity (e.g., network formation and maturation), cellular composition in long-term culture, and the transcriptome of the two cultures. Compared to simple cultures, neurons from complex co-cultures exhibited earlier synapse and network development and maturation, which was supported by localized synaptophysin expression, up-regulation of genes involved in mature neuronal processes, and synchronized neural network activity. Also, mature oligodendrocytes and reactive astrocytes were only detected in complex cultures upon transcriptomic analysis of age-matched cultures. Functionally, the GABA antagonist bicuculline had a greater influence on bursting activity in complex versus simple cultures. Collectively, the cellular complexity of brain-on-a-chip systems intrinsically develops cell type-specific phenotypes relevant to the brain while accelerating the maturation of neuronal networks, important features underdeveloped in traditional cultures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksLab-On-A-Chip DevicesNeurogenesisOligodendrogliaRatsSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSynaptophysinSynaptophysinSyp protein, rat

Identifiers

PMID32620908
PMCPMC7335084
OpenAlexW3040254894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.