Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620753›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Integrated pharmaco-proteogenomics defines two subgroups in isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma with prognostic and therapeutic opportunities.

Sejin Oh, Jeonghun Yeom, Hee Jin Cho, Ju-Hwa Kim, Seon-Jin Yoon, Hakhyun Kim, Jason K Sa, Shinyeong Ju, Hwanho Lee, Myung Joon Oh and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. FKBP9 enhances IGF2BP1-mediated mJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Sejin Oh *Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-6216
Jeonghun Yeom *Center for Theragnosis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9577-1243
Hee Jin Cho *Institute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ju-Hwa KimGraduate Program for Nanomedical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Seon-Jin YoonBrain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3255-5081
Hakhyun KimBrain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-3509
Jason K SaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-5004
Shinyeong JuCenter for Theragnosis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4690
Hwanho LeeBrain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-1091
Myung Joon OhSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Wonyeop LeeDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Yumi KwonCenter for Theragnosis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
Honglan LiDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Seunghyuk ChoiDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3600-1868
Jang Hee HanSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-9800
Eunsuk ChoiInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-2753
Jayeon KimInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Nam-Gu HerInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-7372
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Medical Science, Yonsei University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-2037
Eunok PaekDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. eunokpaek@hanyang.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-9749
Do-Hyun NamInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. nsnam@skku.edu.
Cheolju LeeCenter for Theragnosis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea. clee270@kist.re.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8482-4696
Hyun Seok KimSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hsfkim@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-8690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic and therapeutic relevance of molecular subtypes for the most aggressive isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) is currently limited due to high molecular heterogeneity of the tumors that impedes patient stratification. Here, we describe a distinct binary classification of IDH wild-type GBM tumors derived from a quantitative proteomic analysis of 39 IDH wild-type GBMs as well as IDH mutant and low-grade glioma controls. Specifically, GBM proteomic cluster 1 (GPC1) tumors exhibit Warburg-like features, neural stem-cell markers, immune checkpoint ligands, and a poor prognostic biomarker, FKBP prolyl isomerase 9 (FKBP9). Meanwhile, GPC2 tumors show elevated oxidative phosphorylation-related proteins, differentiated oligodendrocyte and astrocyte markers, and a favorable prognostic biomarker, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH). Integrating these proteomic features with the pharmacological profiles of matched patient-derived cells (PDCs) reveals that the mTORC1/2 dual inhibitor AZD2014 is cytotoxic to the poor prognostic PDCs. Our analyses will guide GBM prognosis and precision treatment strategies.

Indexed as

BenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKaplan-Meier EstimateMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2MorpholinesMutationPrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsProteogenomicsBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2MorpholinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesvistusertib

Identifiers

PMID32620753
PMCPMC7335111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.