ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2020
Age matters: Grading granule secretion in beta cells.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated biophysical and spatial remodeling during insulin secretory granule maturation at the mitochondrial network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insulin is stored in secretory granules to facilitate rapid release in response to rising glucose levels, but the mechanisms by which these granules are identified and prioritized for secretion remains unclear. Using a fluorescent timer and flow cytometry-assisted organelle sorting, Yau
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.