Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620487›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia2020

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Sreekanth Cheruku, Siddharth Dave, Kristina Goff, Caroline Park, Callie Ebeling, Leah Cohen, Kim Styrvoky, Christopher Choi, Vikram Anand, Corey Kershaw

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Airborne Isolation Cardiac Arrest: A Simulation Program for Interdisciplinary Code Blue Team Training.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  7. Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sreekanth CherukuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: Sreekanth.Cheruku@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Siddharth DaveDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Kristina GoffDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Caroline ParkDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Callie EbelingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Leah CohenDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Kim StyrvokyDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Christopher ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Vikram AnandDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Corey KershawDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2-associated disease (coronavirus disease 2019) poses a unique challenge to health- care providers due to the risk of viral aerosolization and disease transmission. This has caused some centers to modify existing CPR procedures, limit the duration of CPR, or consider avoiding CPR altogether. In this review, the authors propose a procedure for CPR in the intensive care unit that minimizes the number of personnel in the immediate vicinity of the patient and conserves the use of scarce personal protective equipment. Highlighting the low likelihood of successful resuscitation in high-risk patients may prompt patients to decline CPR. The authors recommend the preemptive placement of central venous lines in high-risk patients with intravenous tubing extensions that allow for medication delivery from outside the patients' rooms. During CPR, this practice can be used to deliver critical medications without delay. The use of a mechanical compression system for CPR further reduces the risk of infectious exposure to health- care providers. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be reserved for patients with few comorbidities and a single failing organ system. Reliable teleconferencing tools are essential to facilitate communication between providers inside and outside the patients' rooms. General principles regarding the ethics and peri-resuscitative management of coronavirus 2019 patients also are discussed.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusIntensive Care UnitsCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Critical CareHeart ArrestHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Workflowcardiopulmonary resuscitationcoronaviruscoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19critical caredo-not-resuscitatemechanical compression devicepandemicpersonal protection equipment

Identifiers

PMID32620487
PMCPMC7286272
OpenAlexW3032909852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.