Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620259›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of anaesthesia2021

Patient blood management interventions do not lead to important clinical benefits or cost-effectiveness for major surgery: a network meta-analysis.

Marius A Roman, Riccardo G Abbasciano, Suraj Pathak, Shwe Oo, Syabira Yusoff, Marcin Wozniak, Saqib Qureshi, Florence Y Lai, Tracy Kumar, Toby Richards and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06358079 (Isolated Cardiotomy Circuit for Re-infusion of Unwashed Shed Blood During Off-pump Coronary Artery Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06358079 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Isolated Cardiotomy Circuit for Re-infusion of Unwashed Shed Blood During Off-pump Coronary Artery Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Blood Transfusion Complication, Cardiovascular ComplicationArmsRe-infusion of unwashed shed blood
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Survey on perioperative tranexamic acid use.British journal of haematology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. PBM and ERAS: mandatory bedfellows.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Marius A RomanDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: mr345@le.ac.uk.
Riccardo G AbbascianoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Suraj PathakDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shwe OoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Syabira YusoffDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Marcin WozniakDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Saqib QureshiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Florence Y LaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Tracy KumarDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Toby RichardsFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Guiqing YaoBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Lise EstcourtHaematology/Transfusion Medicine, NHS Blood, and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Gavin J MurphyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GBLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/13/6/29947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient blood management (PBM) interventions aim to improve clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding and transfusion. We assessed whether existing evidence supports the routine use of combinations of these interventions during and after major surgery.

methodsFive systematic reviews and a National Institute of Health and Care Excellence health economic review of trials of common PBM interventions enrolling participants of any age undergoing surgery were updated. The last search was on June 1, 2019. Studies in trauma, burns, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, gynaecology, dentistry, or critical care were excluded. The co-primary outcomes were: risk of receiving red cell transfusion and 30-day or hospital all-cause mortality. Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity assessments used I

resultsSearches identified 393 eligible randomised controlled trials enrolling 54 917 participants. PBM interventions resulted in a reduction in exposure to red cell transfusion (RR=0.60; 95% CI 0.57, 0.63; I

conclusionsIn randomised trials, PBM interventions do not have important clinical benefits beyond reducing bleeding and transfusion in people undergoing major surgery.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPostoperative HemorrhageSurgical Procedures, Operativebleedingcosteffectivenesshaematologynetworkpatient blood managementsurgerytransfusion

Identifiers

PMID32620259
PMCPMC7844348
OpenAlexW3038264797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.