Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620157›Full record

ReviewBMC pediatrics2020

Assessing quality of life in psychosocial and mental health disorders in children: a comprehensive overview and appraisal of generic health related quality of life measures.

Jochen O Mierau, Daphne Kann-Weedage, Pieter J Hoekstra, Lisan Spiegelaar, Danielle E M C Jansen, Karin M Vermeulen, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Barbara J van den Hoofdakker, Erik Buskens, M Elske van den Akker-van Marle and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Quality of Life and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Patients With Cancer: Insights From a Tertiary Care Hospital.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jochen O MierauFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daphne Kann-WeedageNetherlands Youth Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pieter J HoekstraDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lisan SpiegelaarFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Danielle E M C JansenDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Karin M VermeulenDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Barbara J van den HoofdakkerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erik BuskensUniversity Medical Center Groningen and Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M Elske van den Akker-van MarleDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carmen D DirksenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Annabeth P GroenmanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, freepostnumber 176, 9700VB, Groningen, The Netherlands. A.groenman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8394-6605

Funding

ZonMw 729300201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems often arise in childhood and adolescence and can have detrimental effects on people's quality of life (QoL). Therefore, it is of great importance for clinicians, policymakers and researchers to adequately measure QoL in children. With this review, we aim to provide an overview of existing generic measures of QoL suitable for economic evaluations in children with mental health problems.

methodsFirst, we undertook a meta-review of QoL instruments in which we identified all relevant instruments. Next, we performed a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the identified instruments. Lastly, the results were summarized in a decision tree.

resultsThis review provides an overview of these 22 generic instruments available to measure QoL in children with psychosocial and or mental health problems and their psychometric properties. A systematic search into the psychometric quality of these instruments found 195 suitable papers, of which 30 assessed psychometric quality in child and adolescent mental health.

conclusionsWe found that none of the instruments was perfect for use in economic evaluation of child and adolescent mental health care as all instruments had disadvantages, ranging from lack of psychometric research, no proxy version, not being suitable for young children, no age-specific value set for children under 18, to insufficient focus on relevant domains (e.g. social and emotional domains).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersQuality of LifeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansMental HealthProxyPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32620157
PMCPMC7333319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.