Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620153›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2020

Outcomes assessment in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using qualitative and quantitative imaging features.

Michael J King, Stefanie Hectors, Karen M Lee, Olamide Omidele, James S Babb, Myron Schwartz, Parissa Tabrizian, Bachir Taouli, Sara Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael J KingDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
Stefanie HectorsDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
Karen M LeeDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
Olamide OmideleDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
James S BabbDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Myron SchwartzRecanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Parissa TabrizianRecanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Bachir TaouliDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
Sara LewisDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA. Sara.Lewis@mountsinai.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the performance of imaging features, including radiomics texture features, in predicting histopathologic tumor grade, AJCC stage, and outcomes [time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS)] in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

methodsSeventy-three patients (26 M/47F, mean age 63y) with pre-operative imaging (CT, n = 37; MRI, n = 21; CT and MRI, n = 15] within 6 months of resection were included in this retrospective study. Qualitative imaging traits were assessed by 2 observers. A 3rd observer measured tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), enhancement ratios (ERs), and Haralick texture features. Blood biomarkers and imaging features were compared with histopathology (tumor grade and AJCC stage) and outcomes (TTR and OS) using log-rank, generalized Wilcoxon, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Fisher exact tests.

resultsMedian TTR and OS were 53.9 and 79.7 months. ICC recurred in 64.4% (47/73) of patients and 46.6% (34/73) of patients died. There was fair accuracy for some qualitative imaging features in the prediction of worse tumor grade (maximal AUC of 0.68 for biliary obstruction on MRI, p = 0.032, observer 1) and higher AJCC stage (maximal AUC of 0.73 for biliary obstruction on CT, p = 0.002, observer 2; and AUC of 0.73 for vascular involvement on MRI, p = 0.01, observer 2). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that CA 19-9 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.44/95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-4.57/p = 0.005)] and tumor size on imaging (HR 1.13/95% CI 1.04-1.22/p = 0.003) were significant predictors of TTR, while CA 19-9 (HR 4.08/95% CI 1.75-9.56, p = 0.001) and presence of metastatic lymph nodes at histopathology (HR 2.86/95% CI 1.35-6.07/p = 0.006) were significant predictors of OS. On multivariable analysis, satellite lesions on CT (HR 2.79/95%CI 1.01-7.15/p = 0.032, observer 2), vascular involvement on MRI (HR 0.10/95% CI 0.01-0.85/p = 0.032, observer 1), and texture feature MRI variance (HR 0.55/95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.040) predicted TTR once adjusted for the independent predictors CA 19-9 and tumor size on imaging. Several qualitative and quantitative features demonstrated associations with TTR, OS, and AJCC stage at univariable analysis (range: HR 0.35-19; p < 0.001-0.045), however none were predictive of OS at multivariable analysis when adjusted for CA 19-9 and metastatic lymph nodes (p > 0.088).

conclusionsThere was reasonable accuracy in predicting tumor grade and higher AJCC stage in ICC utilizing certain qualitative and quantitative imaging traits. Serum CA 19-9, tumor size, presence of metastatic lymph nodes, and qualitative imaging traits of satellite lesions and vascular involvement are predictors of patient outcomes, along with a promising predictive ability of certain quantitative texture features.

Indexed as

AgedBile Duct NeoplasmsChild, PreschoolCholangiocarcinomaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProportional Hazards ModelsBile duct cancerComputed tomography (CT)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)SurvivalTexture

Identifiers

PMID32620153
PMCPMC7333305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.