ArticleBMC biology2020
Temporospatial shifts within commercial laboratory mouse gut microbiota impact experimental reproducibility.
Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut Bacteroides act in a microbial consortium to cause susceptibility to severe malaria.Nature communications · 2023Pooled it
- Aquaculture facility-specific microbiota shape the zebrafish gut microbiome.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- The Clinical View of Sepsis-Associated AKI: How Basic Science Can Help Solve This Problem.Seminars in nephrology · 2025Review
- Aquaculture facility-specific microbiota shape the zebrafish gut microbiome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Influence of Water Delivery Method on the Gut Microbiome in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025Article
- Standard mouse diets lead to differences in severity in infectious and non-infectious colitis.mBio · 2025Article
- Microbiome-mediated modulation of immune memory to P. yoelii affects the resistance to secondary cerebral malaria challenge.ImmunoHorizons · 2025Article
- The microbiota, the malarial parasite, and the mice-a three-sided relationship.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Cecal microbiome transplantation without antibiotic preconditioning standardizes murine microbiomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Intestinal injury and the gut microbiota in patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria.PLoS pathogens · 2023Review
- Mechanistic insights into the interaction between the host gut microbiome and malaria.PLoS pathogens · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Microbiota of the Pregnant Mouse: Characterization of the Bacterial Communities in the Oral Cavity, Lung, Intestine, and Vagina through Culture and DNA Sequencing.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Article
- Cage Environment Regulates Gut Microbiota Independent of Toll-Like Receptors.Infection and immunity · 2021Article
- The gut microbiome of laboratory mice: considerations and best practices for translational research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021Review
- The microbiome and rodent models of immune mediated diseases.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExperimental reproducibility in mouse models is impacted by both genetics and environment. The generation of reproducible data is critical for the biomedical enterprise and has become a major concern for the scientific community and funding agencies alike. Among the factors that impact reproducibility in experimental mouse models is the variable composition of the microbiota in mice supplied by different commercial vendors. Less attention has been paid to how the microbiota of mice supplied by a particular vendor might change over time.
resultsIn the course of conducting a series of experiments in a mouse model of malaria, we observed a profound and lasting change in the severity of malaria in mice infected with Plasmodium yoelii; while for several years mice obtained from a specific production suite of a specific commercial vendor were able to clear the parasites effectively in a relatively short time, mice subsequently shipped from the same unit suffered much more severe disease. Gut microbiota analysis of frozen cecal samples identified a distinct and lasting shift in bacteria populations that coincided with the altered response of the later shipments of mice to infection with malaria parasites. Germ-free mice colonized with cecal microbiota from mice within the same production suite before and after this change followed by Plasmodium infection provided a direct demonstration that the change in gut microbiota profoundly impacted the severity of malaria. Moreover, spatial changes in gut microbiota composition were also shown to alter the acute bacterial burden following Salmonella infection, and tumor burden in a lung tumorigenesis model.
conclusionThese changes in gut bacteria may have impacted the experimental reproducibility of diverse research groups and highlight the need for both laboratory animal providers and researchers to collaborate in determining the methods and criteria needed to stabilize the gut microbiota of animal breeding colonies and research cohorts, and to develop a microbiota solution to increase experimental rigor and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.