Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620102›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2020

Machine learning prediction of stone-free success in patients with urinary stone after treatment of shock wave lithotripsy.

Seung Woo Yang, Yun Kyong Hyon, Hyun Seok Na, Long Jin, Jae Geun Lee, Jong Mok Park, Ji Yong Lee, Ju Hyun Shin, Jae Sung Lim, Yong Gil Na and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Woo YangDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Yun Kyong HyonDivision of Medical Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70 Yuseong-daero 1689beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 34047.
Hyun Seok NaDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Long JinDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Jae Geun LeeDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Jong Mok ParkDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Ji Yong LeeDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Ju Hyun ShinDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Jae Sung LimDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Yong Gil NaDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Kiwan JeonDivision of Medical Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70 Yuseong-daero 1689beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 34047.
Taeyoung HaDivision of Medical Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70 Yuseong-daero 1689beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 34047.
Jinbum KimDepartment of Urology, Konyang University College of Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, 158 Gwanjeodong-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35365.
Ki Hak SongDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015. urosong@cnu.ac.kr.
Chungnam National University Hospital · KRNational Institute for Mathematical Sciences · KRKonyang University Hospital · KR

Funding

Chungnam National University Hospital Research Fund 2018-2019National Institute for Mathematical Sciences (NIMS) grant funded by the Korea government 2020 No. NIMS-B20900000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study were to determine the predictive value of decision support analysis for the shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) success rate and to analyze the data obtained from patients who underwent SWL to assess the factors influencing the outcome by using machine learning methods.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 358 patients who underwent SWL for urinary stone (kidney and upper-ureter stone) between 2015 and 2018 and evaluated the possible prognostic features, including patient population characteristics, urinary stone characteristics on a non-contrast, computed tomographic image. We performed 80% training set and 20% test set for the predictions of success and mainly used decision tree-based machine learning algorithms, such as random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting method (LightGBM).

resultsIn machine learning analysis, the prediction accuracies for stone-free were 86.0, 87.5, and 87.9%, and those for one-session success were 78.0, 77.4, and 77.0% using RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM, respectively. In predictions for stone-free, LightGBM yielded the best accuracy and RF yielded the best one in those for one-session success among those methods. The sensitivity and specificity values for machine learning analytics are (0.74 to 0.78 and 0.92 to 0.93) for stone-free and (0.79 to 0.81 and 0.74 to 0.75) for one-session success, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) values for machine learning analytics are (0.84 to 0.85) for stone-free and (0.77 to 0.78) for one-session success and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are (0.730 to 0.933) and (0.673 to 0.866) in average of methods, respectively.

conclusionsWe applied a selected machine learning analysis to predict the result after treatment of SWL for urinary stone. About 88% accurate machine learning based predictive model was evaluated. The importance of machine learning algorithm can give matched insights to domain knowledge on effective and influential factors for SWL success outcomes.

Indexed as

LithotripsyMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUreteral CalculiArtificial intelligenceLithotripsyMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID32620102
PMCPMC7333255
OpenAlexW3038876037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.