ArticleBMC urology2020
Machine learning prediction of stone-free success in patients with urinary stone after treatment of shock wave lithotripsy.
Article in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can AI and predictive models accurately predict stone-free status? a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Stone-Free Status in Urinary Stone Disease Treated with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- The Ascent of Artificial Intelligence in Endourology: a Systematic Review Over the Last 2 Decades.Current urology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Risk factors and a predictive model for steinstrasse formation after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- From data to decision: integrating causality AI and predictive analytics in endourological practice-a descriptive guide for clinicians from EAU Endourology.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of stone-free status following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Review
- Predicting ESWL success for ureteral stones: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning for early prediction of the infection in patients with urinary stone after treatment of holmium laser lithotripsy.PloS one · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models Decoding the Association Between Urinary Stone Diseases and Metabolic Urinary Profiles.Metabolites · 2024Article
- A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status at ureteroscopy.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: A comprehensive review.Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- The Lifetime History of the First Italian Public Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Lithotripter as a Mirror of the Evolution of Endourology over the Last Decade.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Type and Outcome of Ureteral Stones Treatments.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- A retrospective cohort study on the use of machine learning to predict stone-free status following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An experience from Saudi Arabia.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning for Renal Pathologies: An Updated Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A warning system for urolithiasis via retrograde intrarenal surgery using machine learning: an experimental study.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aims of this study were to determine the predictive value of decision support analysis for the shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) success rate and to analyze the data obtained from patients who underwent SWL to assess the factors influencing the outcome by using machine learning methods.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 358 patients who underwent SWL for urinary stone (kidney and upper-ureter stone) between 2015 and 2018 and evaluated the possible prognostic features, including patient population characteristics, urinary stone characteristics on a non-contrast, computed tomographic image. We performed 80% training set and 20% test set for the predictions of success and mainly used decision tree-based machine learning algorithms, such as random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting method (LightGBM).
resultsIn machine learning analysis, the prediction accuracies for stone-free were 86.0, 87.5, and 87.9%, and those for one-session success were 78.0, 77.4, and 77.0% using RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM, respectively. In predictions for stone-free, LightGBM yielded the best accuracy and RF yielded the best one in those for one-session success among those methods. The sensitivity and specificity values for machine learning analytics are (0.74 to 0.78 and 0.92 to 0.93) for stone-free and (0.79 to 0.81 and 0.74 to 0.75) for one-session success, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) values for machine learning analytics are (0.84 to 0.85) for stone-free and (0.77 to 0.78) for one-session success and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are (0.730 to 0.933) and (0.673 to 0.866) in average of methods, respectively.
conclusionsWe applied a selected machine learning analysis to predict the result after treatment of SWL for urinary stone. About 88% accurate machine learning based predictive model was evaluated. The importance of machine learning algorithm can give matched insights to domain knowledge on effective and influential factors for SWL success outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.