Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32620080›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2020

Evaluation of the effect of the mouth gag use on optic nerve sheath diameter of pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy or Adenotonsillectomy: An observational study.

Başak Altiparmak, Melike Korkmaz Toker, Ali İhsan Uysal, Sabri Köseoğlu, Semra Gümüş Demirbilek

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Effect of twin block on intracranial pressure.Clinical oral investigations · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Children: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Başak AltiparmakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey. basakaltiparmak@mu.edu.tr.
Melike Korkmaz TokerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.
Ali İhsan UysalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey.
Sabri KöseoğluDepartment of Ear Nose Throat, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.
Semra Gümüş DemirbilekDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.
Muğla University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA mouth gag is usually used during tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy surgeries, cleft palate repair, obstructive sleep apnea surgery, and intraoral tumor excision. The placement of the gag causes hemodynamic changes similar to laryngoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mouth gag placement on the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) of pediatric patients. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between neck extension and changes in ONSD.

methodsThe trial was prospectively registered to the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618000551291) on 12.04.2018. This prospective, observational study was performed in a tertiary university hospital operating room between 01.05.2018-01.07.2018. Thirty-five children aged < 18 years, with ASA I status, who were scheduled for tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy surgeries were prospectively included in the study. Measurements of ONSD were performed (T0) after induction of anesthesia, (T1) after endotracheal intubation, (T2) after mouth gag placement, and (T3) 20 min after mouth gag placement. After the mouth gag was placed and the head was positioned for surgery, the degree of neck extension was calculated.

resultsAll participants completed the study. There were significant differences in ONSD values at time points T1, T2, and T3 (p < 0.001, CI: - 0.09,-0.05; p < 0.001, CI: - 0.09,-0.05; p < 0.001, CI: - 0.05,-0.02; respectively). The maximum increase in ONSD was after intubation (0.69 ± 0.06 mm) and immediately after mouth gag placement (0.67 ± 0.07 mm). ONSD values continued to increase 20 min after gag placement (0.36 ± 0.04). There was no relation between the degree of neck extension and ONSD values (β = 0.63, p = 0.715).

conclusionsThe use of a mouth gag causes significant increases in ONSD measurements of children. Therefore, attention to the duration of mouth gag placement should be considered during surgery.

trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered to the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618000551291 ) on 12.04.2018.

Indexed as

AdenoidectomyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial PressureMaleMouthOptic NerveProspective StudiesTonsillectomyMouth gagOptic nerveTonsillectomyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32620080
PMCPMC7333300
OpenAlexW3039229119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.