Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32619959›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2020

High-Throughput Transcription-mediated amplification on the Hologic Panther is a highly sensitive method of detection for SARS-CoV-2.

Andrew J Gorzalski, Honglin Tian, Chris Laverdure, Sergey Morzunov, Subhash C Verma, Stephanie VanHooser, Mark W Pandori

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Agnostic Sequencing for Detection of Viral Pathogens.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J GorzalskiNevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV, United States.
Honglin TianNevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV, United States.
Chris LaverdureNevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV, United States.
Sergey MorzunovNevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV, United States.
Subhash C VermaUniversity of Nevada, Reno, School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Reno, NV, United States.
Stephanie VanHooserNevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV, United States.
Mark W PandoriNevada State Public Health Laboratory, Reno, NV, United States; University of Nevada, Reno, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Reno, NV, United States. Electronic address: mpandori@unr.edu.
Nevada Division of Public and Behavioral Health · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the demand for laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 increases, additional varieties of testing methodologies are being considered. While real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has performed as the main method for virus detection, other methods are becoming available, including transcription mediated amplification (TMA). The Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay utilizes TMA as a target amplification mechanism, and it has only recently received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

objectivesWe sought to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay to RTPCR as a means of SARS-CoV-2 detection in a diagnostic setting. STUDY

designWe performed a limit-of-detection study (LoD) to assess the analytical sensitivity of TMA and RT-PCR. This preceded a comparison of the methods using previously evaluated clinical specimens (nasopharyngeal swabs) using 116 human specimens tested by both methodologies. Specimens included sixty-one (61) specimens found reactive by real-time PCR, fifty-one (51) found non-reactive, and four (4) deemed inconclusive.

resultsThe Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay showed a markedly higher analytical sensitivity than RT-PCR by LoD study. Evaluation of clinical specimens resulted in fewer inconclusive results by the SARS-CoV-2 assay, leading to potentially higher clinical sensitivity.

conclusionsHigher analytical sensitivity may explain TMA's ability to ascertain for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genome in human specimens deemed inconclusive by real-time PCR. TMA provides an effective, highly sensitive means of detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityCovid-19 aAPC vaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, ViralAptimaRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2SensitivityTMATranscription mediated amplification

Identifiers

PMID32619959
PMCPMC7286273
OpenAlexW3034137133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.