Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32619868›Full record

Trial reportAddictive behaviors2020

Extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone to treat opioid use disorder among black adults.

Angela M Haeny, LaTrice Montgomery, A Kathleen Burlew, Aimee N C Campbell, Jennifer Scodes, Martina Pavlicova, John Rotrosen, Edward Nunes

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addictive behaviors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M HaenyYale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 34 Park St., New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: angela.haeny@yale.edu.
LaTrice MontgomeryUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3131 Harvey Avenue., Cincinnati, OH 45229, United States.
A Kathleen BurlewUniversity of Cincinnati, Department of Psychology, 2600 Clifton Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States.
Aimee N C CampbellColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States.
Jennifer ScodesColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States.
Martina PavlicovaColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States.
John RotrosenNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, One Park Ave., New York, NY 10016, United States.
Edward NunesColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States.
Columbia University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USNew York University · USYale University · US

Funding

Project-003UG1DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Aimee N Campbell, Jennifer McNeely · 2015 to 2026
$130.3M
The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013045 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LING, WALTER NMN · 1999 to 2015
$52.6M
Clinical Trials Network, Ohio Valley Node U10DA013732U10DA013732 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WINHUSEN, T JOHN · 2000 to 2015
$45.0M
NIDA CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK - NYC EAST SIDE NODEU10DA013046 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ROTROSEN, JOHN P · 2000 to 2009
$20.2M
Clinical Trials Network: Southwest NodeU10DA015833 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MCCRADY, BARBARA S · 2002 to 2014
$19.9M
Research Training Program in Substance Use PreventionT32DA019426 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMI P SULLIVAN · 2005 to 2026
$7.5M
Mentoring Emerging Scientists for Careers in Substance Use ResearchR25DA035163 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Carmen L Masson, Gideon St.Helen · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Twitter-Based Intervention for Young Adult African American Blunt SmokersK23DA042130 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MONTGOMERY, LATRICE · 2017 to 2021
$726k
NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201200017CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201500065CNIDA NIH HHS K23 DA042130NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA035163NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA019426NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013045NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013046NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013732NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015833NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies examine the effectiveness of treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) among Black individuals despite recent evidence suggesting opioid overdose death rates are, in some cases, highest and increasing at a faster rate among Black people compared to other racial/ethnic groups. This secondary analysis study investigated treatment preference, retention, and relapse rates amongst a subgroup of 73 Black participants with OUD (81% male, mean age 39.05, SD = 11.80) participating in a 24-week multisite randomized clinical trial ("X:BOT") comparing the effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) between 2014 and 2017. Chi-square analyses were used to investigate treatment preference assessed at baseline, and logistic regression analyses were used to investigate differences in the odds of retention and relapse assessed over the 24-week course of treatment between treatment groups. Our findings suggest no differences in preference for XR-NTX versus BUP-NX. However, similar to the parent trial, there was an induction hurdle such that only 59.5% of those randomized to XR-NTX successfully initiated medication compared to 91.6% of those randomized to BUP-NX (OR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.04, 0.52). No significant differences were found in treatment retention (intention-to-treat: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.43, 3.28; per-protocol [i.e., those who initiated medication]: OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.20, 1.82) or relapse rates between treatment groups (intention-to-treat: OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.57, 4.13; per-protocol: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.23, 2.06). Although there is a significant initiation hurdle with XR-NTX, once inducted, both medications appear similar in effectiveness, but as in the main study, dropout rates were high. Future research is needed on how to improve adherence.

Indexed as

Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationOpioid-Related DisordersAdultBlack or African AmericanDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularMaleNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationDelayed-Action PreparationsNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsBlack/African AmericanBuprenorphineNaltrexoneOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32619868
PMCPMC7433932
OpenAlexW3035885077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.