Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32619402›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2020

Structural Insights into Pseudokinase Domains of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases.

Joshua B Sheetz, Sebastian Mathea, Hanna Karvonen, Ketan Malhotra, Deep Chatterjee, Wilhelmiina Niininen, Robert Perttilä, Franziska Preuss, Krishna Suresh, Steven E Stayrook and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modulating pseudokinase conformation from the ATP-binding site.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joshua B SheetzDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Yale University West Campus, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Sebastian MatheaInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Structural Genomics Consortium, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; German Cancer Consortium DKTK Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt 60438, Germany.
Hanna KarvonenCancer Signaling, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology and BioMediTech, Tampere University, Tampere 33014, Finland.
Ketan MalhotraDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Yale University West Campus, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Deep ChatterjeeInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Structural Genomics Consortium, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.
Wilhelmiina NiininenCancer Signaling, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology and BioMediTech, Tampere University, Tampere 33014, Finland.
Robert PerttiläCancer Signaling, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology and BioMediTech, Tampere University, Tampere 33014, Finland.
Franziska PreussInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Structural Genomics Consortium, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.
Krishna SureshDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Steven E StayrookDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Yale University West Campus, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Yuko TsutsuiDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Yale University West Campus, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Ravi RadhakrishnanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Daniela UngureanuCancer Signaling, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology and BioMediTech, Tampere University, Tampere 33014, Finland; Genome-Scale Biology, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland. Electronic address: daniela.ungureanu@tuni.fi.
Stefan KnappInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Structural Genomics Consortium, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; German Cancer Consortium DKTK Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt 60438, Germany. Electronic address: knapp@pharmchem.uni-frankfurt.de.
Mark A LemmonDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Yale University West Campus, West Haven, CT 06516, USA. Electronic address: mark.lemmon@yale.edu.

Funding

PSOC@Penn Education and OutreachU54CA193417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2020
$10.5M
Understanding Signaling by Non-Canonical Receptor Tyrosine KinasesR35GM122485 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark A Lemmon · 2017 to 2026
$7.9M
National Science Foundation DGE1122492NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193417NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122485Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their apparent lack of catalytic activity, pseudokinases are essential signaling molecules. Here, we describe the structural and dynamic properties of pseudokinase domains from the Wnt-binding receptor tyrosine kinases (PTK7, ROR1, ROR2, and RYK), which play important roles in development. We determined structures of all pseudokinase domains in this family and found that they share a conserved inactive conformation in their activation loop that resembles the autoinhibited insulin receptor kinase (IRK). They also have inaccessible ATP-binding pockets, occluded by aromatic residues that mimic a cofactor-bound state. Structural comparisons revealed significant domain plasticity and alternative interactions that substitute for absent conserved motifs. The pseudokinases also showed dynamic properties that were strikingly similar to those of IRK. Despite the inaccessible ATP site, screening identified ATP-competitive type-II inhibitors for ROR1. Our results set the stage for an emerging therapeutic modality of "conformational disruptors" to inhibit or modulate non-catalytic functions of pseudokinases deregulated in disease.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBaculoviridaeBinding SitesCell Adhesion MoleculesCell LineCloning, MolecularCrystallography, X-RayGene ExpressionHumansMiceModels, MolecularPrecursor Cells, B-LymphoidProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandCell Adhesion MoleculesEPHA10 protein, humanEPHB6 protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsPTK7 protein, humanReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Eph FamilyReceptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsRecombinant ProteinsROR1 protein, humanROR2 protein, humanRYK protein, humanSmall Molecule Librariescancergrowth factor signalingGZD824ponatinibprotein conformationpseudokinasesreceptor tyrosine kinasestargeted therapiesWnt signaling

Identifiers

PMID32619402
PMCPMC7543951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.