Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32619340›Full record

SynthesisArthritis care & research2021

Systematic Literature Review of Residual Symptoms and an Unmet Need in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Kaleb Michaud, Janet Pope, Mart van de Laar, Jeffrey R Curtis, Carol Kannowski, Sarah Mitchell, Judith Bell, Jennifer Workman, Jim Paik, Anabela Cardoso and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis care & research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Towards an individualised approach to pain management in inflammatory arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kaleb MichaudUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas.
Janet PopeUniversity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1479-5302
Mart van de LaarUniversity of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-8976
Carol KannowskiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Sarah MitchellRTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK.
Judith BellRTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9651-7463
Jennifer WorkmanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jim PaikEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Anabela CardosoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Peter C TaylorBotnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USThe National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Twente · NLWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the nature and burden of residual disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who meet treatment targets. Second, for those who did not meet targets, to evaluate how much is due to patient symptoms.

methodsProspective and retrospective studies were searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library in the English language from January 1, 2008 to April 18, 2018; conference abstracts (from January 2016 to April 2018) and reference lists of relevant studies were also screened.

resultsOf 8,339 records identified, 55 were included in the review; 53 were unique studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials. Of these, 48 reported on patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) or remission. Studies varied in population, treatment goals, and outcome reporting. The proportions of patients with residual symptoms in these studies varied by the definitions used for LDA or remission and were more often reported in patients with LDA than those in remission. The most commonly reported outcome measures were functional disability (n = 34 studies), tender or swollen joints (n = 18), pain (n = 17), patient global assessment (n = 15), and fatigue (n = 14). However, few studies reported the percentage of patients achieving a specific threshold, which could then be used to easily define the presence of residual symptoms.

conclusionResidual symptoms are present in some patients despite their achieving LDA or remission, highlighting an unmet need, especially with respect to improving pain, fatigue, and function. Standardized reporting in future observational studies would facilitate better understanding of this issue in defined RA populations.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandSymptom AssessmentAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFunctional StatusHumansMental HealthNeeds AssessmentPain MeasurementQuality of LifeRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32619340
PMCPMC8596735
OpenAlexW3036517323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.