Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32619298›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2020

Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant-soil feedbacks.

Elizabeth M Wandrag, Sarah E Bates, Luke G Barrett, Jane A Catford, Peter H Thrall, Wim H van der Putten, Richard P Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth M WandragInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-539X
Sarah E BatesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Luke G BarrettCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Jane A CatfordDepartment of Geography, King's College London, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0582-5960
Peter H ThrallCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Wim H van der PuttenDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), PO Box 50, Wageningen, 6700 AB, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-4442
Richard P DuncanInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-449X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co-evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However, attempts to identify a phylogenetic signal in plant-soil feedbacks have produced mixed results. Here we clarify how phylogenetic signals could arise in plant-soil feedbacks and use a recent compilation of data from feedback experiments to identify: whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of plant-soil feedbacks; and whether any signal arises through directional or divergent changes in feedback outcomes with evolutionary time. We find strong evidence for a divergent phylogenetic signal in feedback outcomes. Distantly related plant species show more divergent responses to each other's soil microbiota compared with closely related plant species. The pattern of divergence implies occasional co-evolutionary shifts in how plants interact with soil microbiota, with strongly contrasting feedback responses among some plant lineages. Our results highlight that it is difficult to predict feedback outcomes from phylogeny alone, other than to say that more closely related species tend to have more similar responses.

Indexed as

PlantsSoilFeedbackPhylogenySoil MicrobiologySoilbiotic interactionsBrownian evolutionmutualismspairwise feedbackspathogensplant-soil interactionssymbioses

Identifiers

PMID32619298
PMCPMC7689780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.