ArticleComputer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering2020
Accurate reconstructions of pelvic defects and discontinuities using statistical shape models.
Article in Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical shape models quantify acetabular defects in hip revision surgery: implications for classification and surgical planning.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional bone morphology is a risk factor for medial postmeniscectomy syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Statistical Shape Modelling the In Vivo Location of Acetabular Wear in Retrieved Hip Implants.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- [Rapid femur modeling method based on statistical shape model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Article
- Accuracy of Patient-Specific Drilling Guides in Acetabular Fracture Surgery: A Human Cadaver Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment of large acetabular defects and discontinuities remains challenging and relies on the accurate restoration of the native anatomy of the patient. This study introduces and validates a statistical shape model for the reconstruction of acetabular discontinuities with severe bone loss through a two-sided Markov Chain Monte Carlo reconstruction method. The performance of the reconstruction algorithm was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation in three defect types with varying severity as well as severe defects with discontinuities. The two-sided reconstruction method was compared to a one-sided methodology. Although, reconstruction errors increased with defect size and this increase was most pronounced for pelvic discontinuities, the two-sided reconstruction method was able to reconstruct the native anatomy with higher accuracy than the one-sided reconstruction method. These findings can improve the preoperative planning and custom implant design in patients with large pelvic defects, both with and without discontinuities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.