Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32618572›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Use of a Mobile App to Augment Psychotherapy in a Community Psychiatric Clinic: Feasibility and Fidelity Trial.

Atif Adam, Ameena Jain, Alexandra Pletnikova, Rishi Bagga, Allison Vita, Lisa N Richey, Neda Gould, Supriya Munshaw, Kavi Misrilall, Matthew E Peters

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04200170 (Examining the Feasibility of a Mobile Mental Health Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04200170 naunknown statusnot on this map

Examining the Feasibility of a Mobile Mental Health Application (Rose) for Augmentation of In-person Psychotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsk RoseRan2019 to 2019Enrolled45ConditionsMental Health Wellness 1, DepressionArmsRose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current challenges for evaluating mobile health applications.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Atif AdamRose: Smarter Mental Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0067-7110
Ameena JainKey Point Health Services, Inc, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-0392
Alexandra PletnikovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5887-956X
Rishi BaggaRose: Smarter Mental Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-4250
Allison VitaRose: Smarter Mental Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5053-3505
Lisa N RicheyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-1240
Neda GouldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-6128
Supriya MunshawCarey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-0566
Kavi MisrilallRose: Smarter Mental Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-8957
Matthew E PetersRose: Smarter Mental Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5668-4566
Johns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts Department of Mental Health · USBaltimore City Health Department · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though 1 in 5 Americans experience some form of mental illness each year, 80% have been shown to discontinue psychotherapy prematurely. The traditional psychotherapy service delivery model, consisting of isolated clinical sessions, lacks the ability to keep patients engaged outside clinical sessions. Newer digital mental health platforms can address the clinical need for a robust tool that tracks mental well-being and improves engagement in patients with depressive symptoms.

objectiveThe primary goals of this feasibility study were to (1) assess compliance among providers and their patients with a digital mental health platform protocol, and (2) examine the usability and fidelity of a mobile app through structured participant feedback.

methodsA sample of 30 participants was recruited for a 5-week study from a community-based mental health clinic in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Inclusion criteria were: aged 18 years or older, having access to a smartphone, and having at least mild-to-moderate depression and/or anxiety as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scales, respectively. Eligible participants were randomized into one of two study arms: (1) the intervention arm or (2) the waitlist control arm. Participants in the intervention arm were asked to download the Rose app and were prompted to complete clinical assessments (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) every other week, daily mood and anxiety Likert scales, and daily journal entries. The participants in the waitlist arm served as controls for the study and completed the clinical assessments only. Both arms engaged in weekly psychotherapy sessions, with participant in-app input informing the psychotherapy process of the intervention arm, while those in the waitlist control arm continued their standard care. Outcomes of interest included adherence to completion of in-app assessments and usability of the Rose mobile app assessed through the modified Mobile Application Rating Scale.

resultsOver the study period, a sample of 30 participants used the Rose app 2834 times to complete clinical assessments. On average, 70% (21; 95% CI 61.14%-77.41%) of participants completed mood and anxiety daily check-ins and journal entries 5 days per week. Nearly all participants (29/30, 97%) completed all PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in-app scales during the study. Subjective impressions showed that 73% (22/30) of participants found the mobile app to be engaging and in line with their needs, and approximately 70% (21/30) of participants reported the app functionality and quality of information to be excellent. Additionally, more than two-thirds of the participants felt that their knowledge and awareness of depression and anxiety management improved through using the app.

conclusionsSteady compliance and high app ratings showcase the utility of the Rose mobile mental health app in augmenting the psychotherapy process for patients with mood disorders and improving mental health knowledge. Future studies are needed to further examine the impact of Rose on treatment outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04200170; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04200170.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionmental healthmobile app

Identifiers

PMID32618572
PMCPMC7367543
OpenAlexW3016211317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.