ArticleAmerican journal of men's health
Breast Cancer in Men: Clinical and Pathological Analysis of 817 Cases.
Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case report of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in a Pakistani male aged 55.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals genomic differences between male and female breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of serum alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase as predictive biomarkers for the prognosis of male breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis and comparison of the burden of male breast cancer: differences between the global, China, India, and the United States.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Unusual Presentations of Cancer in the Male Breast.Cureus · 2025Article
- Treatment and Prognosis of Male Breast Cancer: A Multicentric, Retrospective Study Over 11 Years in the Czech Republic.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Prognostic relevance of mixed histological subtypes in invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Invasive ductal carcinoma of breast in a 73-year old male: A rare case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the current study was to describe breast cancer cases in men according to age, stage, and histology, calculating risks compared to women. It is a retrospective cross-sectional study of all breast cancer cases of the Hospital Cancer Registry of São Paulo state, Brazil, 2000-2015. Variables were age, sex, stage, and histology. Absolute numbers and proportions, Mann-Whitney test and prevalence ratio with 95% confidence interval were used. The study included 93,737 cases, of which 817 were males. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.3 years in men and 56.2 years in women (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.