Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2021
The Bioequivalence of Two Peficitinib Formulations, and the Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Peficitinib: Two-Way Crossover Studies of a Single Dose of 150 mg Peficitinib in Healthy Volunteers.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single and Multiple Doses of Peficitinib (ASP015K) in Healthy Chinese Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Trial
- The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of WXFL10203614, a potential selective JAK1 inhibitor, in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marketed tablet formulation of peficitinib differs from the tablet used during the clinical trials. The bioequivalence of the marketed formulation and developmental tablet, and the food effect on the marketed formulation, were analyzed in 2 Japanese open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover studies in healthy male volunteers. Volunteers received a single oral dose of the marketed 150-mg peficitinib tablet under fasted conditions (bioequivalence), and under fed or fasted conditions (food effect). Bioequivalence was compared with the developmental 150-mg tablet. Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected before dose and ≤72 hours after dose. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory variables. In total, 40 and 18 subjects were randomized to the bioequivalence and food effect studies, respectively. The 2 peficitinib formulations were bioequivalent (90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.