Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32618251›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Treatment Coverage Estimation for Mass Drug Administration for Malaria with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine in Southern Province, Zambia.

Timothy P Finn, Joshua O Yukich, Adam Bennett, Travis R Porter, Christopher Lungu, Busiku Hamainza, Elizabeth Chizema Kawesha, Ruben O Conner, Kafula Silumbe, Richard W Steketee and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02329301 (Assessing the Effectiveness of Mass Drug Administration), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02329301 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Effectiveness of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) With Dihydroartemisinin + Piperaquine for Reducing Malaria Parasite Infection Prevalence and Incidence in Southern Province Zambia

TypeinterventionalSponsorPATHRan2014 to 2020Enrolled2,430ConditionsMalaria, Malaria, FalciparumArmsMDA with DHAp (Eurartesim), Focal MDA with DHAp (Eurartesim)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pyronaridine-artesunate in Asymptomatic Malaria-infected Individuals: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal genomic analysis ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent Travel History andThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy P Finn1Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Joshua O Yukich1Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Adam Bennett2Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Travis R Porter1Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Christopher Lungu3PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
Busiku Hamainza4National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Elizabeth Chizema Kawesha4National Malaria Elimination Centre, Zambia Ministry of Health, Chainama Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ruben O Conner5PATH MACEPA, Seattle, Washington.
Kafula Silumbe3PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
Richard W Steketee5PATH MACEPA, Seattle, Washington.
John M Miller3PATH Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), Lusaka, Zambia.
Joseph Keating1Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Thomas P Eisele1Department of Tropical Medicine, Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Tulane University · USNational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZMMinistry of Health · ZMProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass drug administration (MDA) is currently being considered as an intervention in low-transmission areas to complement existing malaria control and elimination efforts. The effectiveness of any MDA strategy is dependent on achieving high epidemiologic coverage and participant adherence rates. A community-randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2014 to March 2016 to evaluate the impact of four rounds of MDA or focal MDA (fMDA)-where treatment was given to all eligible household members if anyone in the household had a positive malaria rapid diagnostic test-on malaria outcomes in Southern Province, Zambia (population approximately 300,000). This study examined epidemiologic coverage and program reach using capture-recapture and satellite enumeration methods to estimate the degree to which the trial reached targeted individuals. Overall, it was found that the percentage of households visited by campaign teams ranged from 62.9% (95% CI: 60.0-65.8) to a high of 77.4% (95% CI: 73.8-81.0) across four rounds of treatment. When the maximum number of visited households across all campaign rounds was used as the numerator, program reach for at least one visit would have been 86.4% (95% CI: 80.8-92.0) in MDA and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.0-89.1) in fMDA trial arms. As per the protocol, the trial provided dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine treatment to an average of 58.8% and 13.3% of the estimated population based on capture-recapture in MDA and fMDA, respectively, across the four rounds.

Indexed as

Mass Drug AdministrationAntimalarialsArtemisininsDrug Therapy, CombinationFamily CharacteristicsHumansMalaria, FalciparumPiperazinesProgram EvaluationQuinolinesZambiaAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimolpiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID32618251
PMCPMC7416979
OpenAlexW3039729283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.