Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32618130›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2020

Mechanical properties of human oral mucosa tissues are site dependent: A combined biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural approach.

Joanne Jung Eun Choi, Johann Zwirner, Rishi Sanjay Ramani, Sunyoung Ma, Haizal Mohd Hussaini, John Neil Waddell, Niels Hammer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal Margin Shrinkage in Oral Cavity Cancer: A Systematic Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanne Jung Eun ChoiFaculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4815-559X
Johann ZwirnerDepartment of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3560-3915
Rishi Sanjay RamaniFaculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sunyoung MaFaculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4722-7766
Haizal Mohd HussainiFaculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5005-5224
John Neil WaddellFaculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Niels HammerDepartment of Clinical and Macroscopic Anatomy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8230-9383
University of Otago · NZMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate load-deformation properties of Thiel-embalmed human oral mucosa tissues and to compare three different anatomical regions in terms of mechanical, histological and ultrastructural characteristic with focus on the extracellular matrix. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty specimens from three different regions of the oral cavity: attached gingiva, buccal mucosa and the hard palate were harvested from two Thiel-embalmed cadavers. Mechanical properties were obtained, combining strain evaluation and digital image correlation in a standardised approach. Elastic modulus, tensile strength, strain at maximum load and strain to failure were computed and analysed statistically. Subsamples were also analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histological analysis.

resultsThe highest elastic modulus of 37.36 ± 17.4 MPa was found in the attached gingiva group, followed by the hard palate and buccal mucosa. The elastic moduli of attached gingiva differed significantly to the buccal mucosa (p = .01) and hard palate (p = .021). However, there was no difference in the elastic moduli between the buccal mucosa and hard palate (p > .22). The tensile strength of the tissue samples ranged from 1.54 ± 0.5MPa to 3.81 ± 0.9 MPa, with a significant difference between gingiva group and buccal mucosa or hard palate (p = .001). No difference was found in the mean tensile strength between the buccal mucosa and hard palate (p = .92). Ultrastructural imaging yielded a morphological basis for the various mechanical properties found intraorally; the attached gingiva showed unidirectional collagen fibre network whereas the buccal mucosa and hard palate showed multi-directional network, which was more prone to tension failure and less elasticity.

conclusionThis is the first study assessing the various morphological-mechanical relationships of intraoral soft tissues, utilising Thiel-embalmed tissues. The findings of this study suggest that the tissues from different intraoral regions showed various morphological-mechanical behaviour which was also confirmed under the SEM and in the histological analysis.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverEmbalmingGingivaHumansMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMouth MucosaPalate, HardTensile StrengthBiomechanicsElastic modulusOral mucosaTensile strengthThiel-embalming

Identifiers

PMID32618130
PMCPMC7745080
OpenAlexW3039387451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.