ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020
Prognostic Significance of Lacunarity in Preoperative Biopsy of Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classifying breast cancer and fibroadenoma tissue biopsies from paraffined stain-free slides by fractal biomarkers in Fourier Ptychographic Microscopy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF TUMOR BUDDING IN SPORADIC COLORECTAL CANCER STAGE II PATIENTS WITH A LOW NUMBER OF LYMPH NODES EXAMINED.Acta clinica Croatica · 2024Article
- Radiographic texture of the trabecular bone of the proximal phalanx in horses with metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis.Journal of equine science · 2024Article
- Classification of Multiple H&E Images via an Ensemble Computational Scheme.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Extracellular Matrix- and Integrin Adhesion Complexes-Related Genes in the Prognosis of Prostate Cancer Patients' Progression-Free Survival.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Prognostic Significance of Amino Acid Metabolism-Related Genes in Prostate Cancer Retrieved by Machine Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantity and quality of preoperative material in colorectal cancer is often limiting factor in determination of risk factors and therapy planning. The most important negative prognostic factors are intravascular and perineural invasion, as well as tumor budding. Usually, the only parameter available in preoperative biopsy is tumor budding. However, the growing body of evidence suggests that cancer differentiation based on the poorly differentiated clusters has better prognostic value. The limiting factor in applying of these new parameters is reproducible, simple, cheap and fast method of their determination. In this paper we investigated the prognostic value of lacunarity, determined in preoperative biopsy. Lacunarity is a measure of spatial heterogeneity (inhomogeneity) in an image. It quantifies how objects fill the space, and enables analysis of gaps distribution, homogeneity of gaps, and presence of structures. It was shown that lacunarity and the total number of buds could be combined in a model which clearly divides colorectal cancer patients in low, medium and high risk subgroups. The paper also points out that the quantitative numerical methods are superior to semiquantitative methods, and that individual methods should be combined using algorithms to obtain a more accurate prediction. Because the study described is designed as a pilot study, verification is needed on a larger sample of patients from independent researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.