Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617921›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Improving Access to Bariatric Surgery for Rural and Remote Patients: Experiences from a State-Wide Bariatric Telehealth Service in Australia.

Andrew Phillip Maurice, Jaisil Eldo Joseph Punnasseril, Sarah Emily King, Benjamin Rees Dodd

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Use and Perception of Video Consultations Among Swedish Dietitians Before and After COVID-19 Onset.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew Phillip MauriceDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. andrew.maurice@uqconnect.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7713-067X
Jaisil Eldo Joseph PunnasserilDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sarah Emily KingDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Benjamin Rees DoddDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe state of Queensland, Australia, is large (1.85 million km

methodsWe reviewed all patients seen in the Bariatric Telehealth Clinic from 2017 to 2019. Patients underwent consultation through video-link software at their local hospital with the multidisciplinary team in Brisbane (surgeon, dietician and clinical nurse). Distances from Brisbane and number of visits were calculated. Telehealth patients were contacted by phone to complete a survey regarding their experiences. This was a 17-question Likert-style survey with scores from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

resultsA total of 85 new patients underwent their initial consultation via telehealth. Each patient had a variable number of in-person as well as telehealth consultations both before and after surgery. Mean distance from telehealth consultation site to Brisbane was 614 km (range 149-2472 km). In total, 41 (48%) completed the survey. With regard to telehealth saving time and money, improving access to bariatric care, and desire to use telehealth again, the mean score was 4 out of 5 or higher for all questions (i.e., agree or strongly agree). There was no identifiable post-operative complication that was caused or exacerbated by telehealth.

conclusionBariatric surgical telehealth appointments are feasible and preferred by most patients residing in rural and remote locations. Each consultation avoids significant travel time and cost for the patient and health service, with no obvious adverse outcomes. Telehealth improves equity and access to specialist services for rural and remote patients.

Indexed as

BariatricsBariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidTelemedicineAustraliaHumansQueenslandBariatric surgeryRemoteRuralTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32617921
PMCPMC7331914
OpenAlexW3040284370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.