Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617884›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Spatial uncertainty improves the distribution of visual attention and the availability of sensory information for conscious report.

Stefano Lasaponara, Mario Pinto, Michele Pellegrino, Ludovica Caratelli, Clelia Rossi-Arnaud, Vincenzo Cestari, Marco Costanzi, Fabrizio Doricchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano LasaponaraDipartimento di Psicologia, "Sapienza", Università di Roma, via dei Marsi, 78, Roma, Italy. stefano.lasaponara@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-2621
Mario PintoFondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Michele PellegrinoFondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Ludovica CaratelliDipartimento di Psicologia, "Sapienza", Università di Roma, via dei Marsi, 78, Roma, Italy.
Clelia Rossi-ArnaudDipartimento di Psicologia, "Sapienza", Università di Roma, via dei Marsi, 78, Roma, Italy.
Vincenzo CestariDipartimento di Psicologia, "Sapienza", Università di Roma, via dei Marsi, 78, Roma, Italy.
Marco CostanziLibera Università Maria Santissima Assunta-LUMSA, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio DoricchiDipartimento di Psicologia, "Sapienza", Università di Roma, via dei Marsi, 78, Roma, Italy.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITLibera Università Maria SS. Assunta · IT

Funding

Sapienza Università di Roma Ateneo2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Picking-up and exploiting spatial and temporal regularities in the occurrence of sensory events is important for goal-directed behaviour. According to the "Predictive Coding Hypothesis" (Friston Philosophical Trans R Soc B 360(1456):815-836, 2005), these regularities are used to generate top-down predictions that are constantly compared with actual sensory events. In a previous study with the Attentional Blink (AB) paradigm, we showed that the temporal and probabilistic uncertainty of T2s that are presented outside the Attentional Blink period, i.e. at least 400 ms after T1, improves the conscious report of T2 that are presented inside the AB. The study of ERP correlated showed that this improvement was associated with a prolonged storage of pre-conscious T2 traces in extra-striate areas (Lasaponara et al. Cortex 71:15-33, 2015). Here, we tested whether variations in the probabilistic cueing of the position of a primary T1 visual target in a 4 × 4 letter array, modulate the retention of memory traces evoked by secondary letter targets (T2) that were presented in other positions of the array. Most important, in each trial, the identity of T2 was specified to participants upon disappearance of the array. We show that high probabilistic cueing facilitates T1 detection and improves the corresponding sensitivity index (d'). In contrast, retention and conscious report of secondary targets (T2) improves when the probabilistic cueing of T1 position is poor. These results suggest that uncertainty in the upcoming position of primary targets boosts the strength of memory traces evoked by secondary targets and improves the possibility that traces of secondary targets gain full access to conscious processing.

Indexed as

Attentional BlinkVisual CortexConsciousnessCuesHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID32617884
OpenAlexW3039751779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.