ReviewFrontiers of medicine2020
State-of-the-art of intelligent minimally invasive surgical robots.
Review in Frontiers of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-automatic puncture robotic system based on real-time multi-modal image fusion: preclinical evaluation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Research on traumatic orthopedic surgery robots: a decade bibliometric analysis of research landscapes and evolving frontiers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Semi-automatic robotic puncture system based on deformable soft tissue point cloud registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- EVALUATION OF NEEDLE DRIVER DESIGNS FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED NEEDLE INSERTIONS UNDER MRI GUIDANCE.International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition : [proceedings]. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and ExpositionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of developed countries are rapidly turning into super-aged societies. Consequently, the demand for reduced surgical invasiveness and enhanced efficiency in the medical field has increased due to the need to reduce the physical burden on older patients and shorten their recovery period. Intelligent surgical robot systems offer high precision, high safety, and reduced invasiveness. This paper presents a review of current intelligent surgical robot systems. The history of robots and three types of intelligent surgical robots are discussed. The problems with current surgical robot systems are then analyzed. Several aspects that should be considered in designing new surgical systems are discussed in detail. The paper ends with a summary of the work and a discussion of future prospects for surgical robot development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32617878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.