Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617874›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2020

Interstitial Lung Disease as an Adverse Drug Reaction in Japan: Exploration of Regulatory Actions as a Basis for High Reporting.

Eiko Iwasa, Yu Fujiyoshi, Yuki Kubota, Ryota Kimura, Rebecca E Chandler, Henric Taavola, G Niklas Norén, Rika Wakao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eiko IwasaPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.
Yu FujiyoshiPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.
Yuki KubotaPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.
Ryota KimuraPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.
Rebecca E ChandlerUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Henric TaavolaUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-2810
G Niklas NorénUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rika WakaoPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan. wakao-rika@pmda.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-381X
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency · JPUppsala Monitoring Centre · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreased post-marketing reports of interstitial lung disease in Japan have been recognized. An understanding of its regional groundings can be important for the global pharmacovigilance community.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore the correlation between high rates of interstitial lung disease reporting and regulatory actions in Japan.

methodsPost-marketing interstitial lung disease-related label changes and interstitial lung disease reports were classified by the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification groups of the suspected drugs. Regulatory actions for the top interstitial lung disease-reporting drugs were compared. The interstitial lung disease reporting patterns of protein kinase inhibitors were compared to those of methotrexate.

resultsInterstitial lung disease-related label changes predominantly occurred for drugs in the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification groups L, J, C, and herbal medicines. Interstitial lung disease was reported most frequently for L group, especially for the protein kinase inhibitors. The regulatory actions for those drugs with the highest number of interstitial lung disease reports (methotrexate, protease kinase inhibitors, gemcitabine, docetaxel) plus monoclonal antibodies were analyzed. The ratio of interstitial lung disease reports to all reports over time was initially high in the re-examination period, while it was constantly low after the period expired. The increase in interstitial lung disease reporting was observed for the drugs for which interstitial lung disease was designated as a priority item in the use-results survey. Methotrexate had more interstitial lung disease reports with multiple suspected drugs and fewer reports with high completeness than the protease kinase inhibitors.

conclusionsThe high rates of interstitial lung disease reporting derived from mainly the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification group L drugs. Interstitial lung disease is the targeted adverse drug reaction in the use-results survey mandated in the re-examination of those drugs. This system provides at least one explanation for the high reporting of interstitial lung disease in Japan.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug and Narcotic ControlAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug LabelingDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansJapanLung Diseases, InterstitialMethotrexateProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMethotrexateProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32617874
PMCPMC7575479
OpenAlexW3040174549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.