Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617862›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020

Examining the influence of different types of dynamic change in a visual search task.

Mengzhu Fu, Logan L Miller, Michael D Dodd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengzhu FuDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. mengzhu.fu@huskers.unl.edu.
Logan L MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Michael D DoddDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.

Funding

Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research 1632849RII Track-2 FEC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been repeatedly demonstrated that when performing a visual search task, items can pop out of a display such that they are identified rapidly, independent of the number of distractors present. It has been less clear whether this type of pop-out is limited to static displays (e.g., images) or whether it can also occur in scenes containing movement, more akin to how we experience the real world. Recently, Jardine and Moore (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 617-630, 2016) examined whether pop-out also occurs in displays consisting of dynamic motion - wherein items in the display rotated continuously until a critical frame that would elicit pop-out under static presentation conditions - and found that search was greatly impaired. It remains unclear, however, whether such impairment is exerted equivalently across all types of dynamic motions or if it is specific to orientation. In the present study, we replicate the original Jardine and Moore (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 617-630, 2016) finding and extend this examination to another dimension - color change. We also explore whether search efficiency can be improved with dynamic context if aspects of the display become predictable. The results suggest that not all types of dynamic change impair search performance. Specifically, oddball color targets continue to pop out even when the items in the display are dynamic. Interestingly, adding predictable context did not aid search accuracy as expected, rather resulting in poorer performance. Taken together, the findings suggest that the influence of dynamic context on search performance is not absolute.

Indexed as

AttentionPattern Recognition, VisualColor PerceptionHumansOrientationReaction TimeAttentionMotionVisual search

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.