ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022
Respiration-averaged CT versus standard CT attenuation map for correction of
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- From incidental positron emission uptake toFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Applications of Positron Emission Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography in Advancing the Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Heart and Vascular Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- AorticJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Advances in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Activity with PET/CT and CTA.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- NaF-PET Imaging of Atherosclerosis Burden.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Anatomical validation of automatic respiratory motion correction for coronary 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography by expert measurements from four-dimensional computed tomography.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Effect of respiratory motion correction and CT-based attenuation correction on dual-gated cardiac PET image quality and quantification.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- A vessel of progress: Aortic microcalcification activity for the quantification ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Aortic valve imaging usingEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2021Review
- Advances in Quantitative Analysis ofMolecular imaging · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the impact of respiratory-averaged computed tomography attenuation correction (RACTAC) compared to standard single-phase computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) map, on the quantitative measures of coronary atherosclerotic lesions of
methodsThis study comprised 23 patients who underwent
resultsIn 23 patients, we evaluated 34 coronary lesions using CTAC and RACTAC reconstructions. There was good agreement between CTAC and RACTAC for TBR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.