Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617781›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2020

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology: systematic review update.

Clemens Walter, Julia C Schmidt, Carin A Rinne, Silwan Mendes, Karl Dula, Anton Sculean

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating Factors Influencing Periodontal Bone Loss Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clemens WalterDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center of Dental Medicine (UZB), University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 40, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. clemens.walter@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-1570
Julia C SchmidtDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center of Dental Medicine (UZB), University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 40, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-8831
Carin A RinneDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center of Dental Medicine (UZB), University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 40, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-0971
Silwan MendesDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center of Dental Medicine (UZB), University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 40, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-1022
Karl DulaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anton SculeanDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2836-5477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo update the findings of a systematic review from the year 2016 on the evidence for the accuracy and potential benefits of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diagnostics. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic literature search was performed and the criteria for PICO, PRISMA and risk of bias assessment were applied. Only clinical trials (> 10 patients) conducted in humans on periodontal bone loss, i.e. vertical and/or horizontal or furcation involvement, in CBCT compared with clinical and/or conventional radiographic measures were included.

resultsFrom 1152 articles identified, 11 case series on furcations and eight on vertical and/or horizontal bone loss were included. The studies showed moderate risk of bias and heterogeneous study designs. The agreement between non-surgical clinical or two-dimensional radiographic assessments of horizontal, vertical or interfurcal bone loss and CBCT measurements was analysed in 11 studies and was low in six studies with comparable study designs. A high accuracy (80-84%) of CBCT measurements compared with intra-surgical findings of furcation involvement was observed in four studies. Comparing CBCT with intra-surgical measurements of vertical or horizontal bone loss, an accuracy between 58 and 93% was found in four out of six studies. Three studies were analysed and indicated benefits of CBCT in decision making and/or a reduction of treatment costs and time in teeth of interest.

conclusionsThe findings provide additional evidence for the accuracy of CBCT in assessing periodontal bone loss. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CBCT is an accurate diagnostic tool in periodontology, which needs to be carefully considered in certain situations.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPatient Care PlanningPeriodonticsCone beam computed tomographyDecision makingDiagnosisFurcation involvementThree-dimensional imagingVertical bone defects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.