Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617758›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2020

In silico structural modeling and analysis of physicochemical properties of curcumin synthase (CURS1, CURS2, and CURS3) proteins of Curcuma longa.

R Santhoshkumar, A Yusuf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of chitosan on plant growth, physiological traits, rhizome attributes, and curcuminoids content of turmeric (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Computational exploration ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  10. ACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In Silico Analysis of the Dextransucrase Obtained FromBioinformatics and biology insights · 2023
    Article
  16. Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. RSC advances · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R SanthoshkumarInteruniversity Centre for Plant Biotechnology, Department of Botany, University of Calicut, Malappuram, Kerala, 673635, India.
A YusufInteruniversity Centre for Plant Biotechnology, Department of Botany, University of Calicut, Malappuram, Kerala, 673635, India. akkara69@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1931-5278

Funding

UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, University Grants Commission UGC-RESEARCH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmaceutically important curcuminoid synthesis in C. longa is controlled by CURS1, CURS2, and CURS3 genes. The present study detected the physicochemical properties and structural characteristics including the secondary and 3D structure of CURS proteins. The primary, secondary, and tertiary structure of the CURS proteins were modeled and characterized using multiple bioinformatics tools such as ExPasy ProtParam tools, self-optimized prediction method with alignment (SOPMA), PSIPRED, and SWISS-MODEL. The predicted secondary structure of curcumin synthase provided an α-helix and random coil as the major components. The reliability of the modeled structure was confirmed using PROCHECK and QMEAN programs.

resultsThe molecular weight of CURS1 is 21093.19 Da, theoretical pI as 4.93, and an aliphatic index of 99.19. Molecular weight of CURS2 and CURS3 proteins are 20266.13 Da and 20629.52 Da, theoretical pI as 5.28 and 4.96, and an aliphatic index of 89.30 and 86.37, respectively. In the predicted secondary structure of CURS proteins, alpha helices and random coils of CURS1, CUR2, and CURS3 were 42.72, 41.38, and 44.74% and 24.87, 31.03, and 17.89, respectively. The extended strands were 16.24, 19.40, and 17.89. QMEAN Z-score is - 0.83, - 0.89, and - 1.09 for CURS1, CURS2, and CURS3, respectively.

conclusionPrediction of the 3D model of a protein by in silico analysis is a highly challenging aspect to confirm the NMR or X-ray crystallographic data. This report can contribute to the understanding of the structure, physicochemical properties, structural motifs, and protein-protein interaction of CURS1, CUR2, and CURS3.

Indexed as

Bioinformatic toolsCurcuminoidsCURSHomology modelingIn silico analysis

Identifiers

PMID32617758
PMCPMC7332660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.