ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020
Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the impact of both preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy with blastocyst morphologic grade on live birth rates in frozen embryo transfers from fresh and frozen donor oocytes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients of different age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024Article
- Pregnancies through oocyte donation. A mini review of pathways involved in placental dysfunction.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Maternal hypercholesterolemia would increase the incidence of embryo aneuploidy in couples with recurrent implantation failure.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- The evolving landscape of donor egg treatment: success, women's choice, and anonymity.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate if preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) improves the odds of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study including in vitro fertilization cycles of women using fresh donor oocytes reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, between 2013 and 2015. Cycles were categorized based on PGT. Primary outcome measure was a good birth outcome (GBO), defined as a singleton, term, live birth with an average birthweight. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models were fit to analyze the effect of PGT. Interaction effect between cycle type (fresh vs frozen) and PGT was tested.
resultsOf 28,153 included cycles, 3708 had PGT while 24,445 did not. PGT cycles were less likely to result in an embryo transfer (ET) (64 vs 94%), but were associated with increased rates of frozen ET (70 vs 41%), single ET (67 vs 44%), and blastocyst ET (87 vs 65%). There was a significant interaction between PGT and cycle type. Cycles using PGT increased the probability of a GBO 12% in frozen cycles (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02, 1.22; p = 0.018), but PGT was detrimental to success in fresh cycles with a 53% reduced likelihood of GBO (RR 0.47; 9% CI 0.41, 0.54; p < 0.001).
conclusionPGT, as practiced during the most recently available national data in women using fresh donor oocytes, was associated with increased probability of a healthy live birth amongst frozen cycles, but was not beneficial in fresh cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.