Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617730›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Cassandra Roeca, Rachel Johnson, Nichole Carlson, Alex J Polotsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cassandra RoecaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Cassandra.roeca@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-7317
Rachel JohnsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
Nichole CarlsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alex J PolotskyDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Colorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate if preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) improves the odds of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study including in vitro fertilization cycles of women using fresh donor oocytes reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, between 2013 and 2015. Cycles were categorized based on PGT. Primary outcome measure was a good birth outcome (GBO), defined as a singleton, term, live birth with an average birthweight. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models were fit to analyze the effect of PGT. Interaction effect between cycle type (fresh vs frozen) and PGT was tested.

resultsOf 28,153 included cycles, 3708 had PGT while 24,445 did not. PGT cycles were less likely to result in an embryo transfer (ET) (64 vs 94%), but were associated with increased rates of frozen ET (70 vs 41%), single ET (67 vs 44%), and blastocyst ET (87 vs 65%). There was a significant interaction between PGT and cycle type. Cycles using PGT increased the probability of a GBO 12% in frozen cycles (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02, 1.22; p = 0.018), but PGT was detrimental to success in fresh cycles with a 53% reduced likelihood of GBO (RR 0.47; 9% CI 0.41, 0.54; p < 0.001).

conclusionPGT, as practiced during the most recently available national data in women using fresh donor oocytes, was associated with increased probability of a healthy live birth amongst frozen cycles, but was not beneficial in fresh cycles.

Indexed as

Oocyte DonationAdultBirth RateBlastocystEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansLive BirthOocyte RetrievalOocytesPregnancyPregnancy, MultiplePregnancy RatePreimplantation DiagnosisDonor oocyteEmbryo transferGood birth outcomeIn vitro fertilizationPreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID32617730
PMCPMC7492301
OpenAlexW3040292232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.