Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617678›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2020

Time course of neurological deficits after surgery for primary brain tumours.

Maria Zetterling, Kristin Elf, Robert Semnic, Francesco Latini, Elisabeth Ronne Engström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria ZetterlingDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Uppsala University, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. maria.zetterling@neuro.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-4590-7063
Kristin ElfDepartment of Neuroscience, Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, Uppsala University, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robert SemnicDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Francesco LatiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Uppsala University, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elisabeth Ronne EngströmDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Uppsala University, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe postoperative course after surgery for primary brain tumours can be difficult to predict. We examined the time course of postoperative neurological deficits and analysed possible predisposing factors.

methodHundred adults with a radiological suspicion of low- or high-grade glioma were prospectively included and the postoperative course analysed. Possible predictors of postoperative neurological deterioration were evaluated.

resultsNew postoperative neurologic deficits occurred in 37% of the patients, and in 4%, there were worsening of a preoperative deficit. In 78%, the deficits occurred directly after surgery. The probable cause of deterioration was EEG-verified seizures in 7, ischemic lesion in 5 and both in 1, resection of eloquent tissue in 6, resection close to eloquent tissue including SMA in 11 and postoperative haematoma in 1 patient. Seizures were the main cause of delayed neurological deterioration. Two-thirds of patients with postoperative deterioration showed complete regression of the deficits, and in 6% of all patients, there was a slight disturbance of the function after 3 months. Remaining deficits were found in 6% and only in patients with preoperative neurological deficits and high-grade tumours with mainly eloquent locations. Eloquent tumour location was a predictor of postoperative neurological deterioration and preoperative neurological deficits of remaining deficits.

conclusionsPostoperative neurological deficits occurred in 41% and remained in 6% of patients. Remaining deficits were found in patients with preoperative neurological deficits and high-grade tumours with mainly eloquent locations. Eloquent tumour location was a predictor of neurological deterioration and preoperative neurological deficits of remaining deficits.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodSeizuresTime FactorsBrain tumour surgeryComplicationsPostoperative neurological deficitTime course

Identifiers

PMID32617678
PMCPMC7593278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.