Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617650›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Regular participation in leisure time activities and high cardiovascular fitness improve motor sequence learning in older adults.

K Zwingmann, L Hübner, W B Verwey, J S Barnhoorn, B Godde, C Voelcker-Rehage

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

K ZwingmannInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2886-6386
L HübnerInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
W B VerweyCognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
J S BarnhoornCognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
B GoddeDepartment of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
C Voelcker-RehageInstitute of Human Movement Science and Health, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany. claudia.voelcker-rehage@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-4099
Chemnitz University of Technology · DEConstructor University · DENetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft VO-15/1 Re-LOAD, GO-8/1 Re-LOADNetherlands Organization for Scientific Research 464-13-157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder adults show higher interindividual performance variability during the learning of new motor sequences than younger adults. It is largely unknown what factors contribute to this variability. This study aimed to, first, characterize age differences in motor sequence learning and, second, examine influencing factors for interindividual performance differences.

method30 young adults (age M = 21.89, SD = 2.08, 20 female) and 29 older adults (age M = 69.55, SD = 3.03, 18 female) participated in the study. Motor sequence learning was assessed with a discrete sequence production (DSP) task, requiring key presses to a sequence of visual stimuli. Three DSP practice phases (á 8 blocks × 16 sequences, two six-element sequences) and two transfer blocks (new untrained sequences) were performed. Older participants conducted the Mini-Mental Status Examination and a visuospatial working-memory task. All participants finished a questionnaire on everyday leisure activities and a cardiovascular fitness test.

resultsPerformance speed increased with practice in both groups, but young improved more than older adults (significant Group × Time effect for response time, F(1,5) = 4.353, p = 0.004, [Formula: see text] = 0.071). Accuracy did not change in any age group (non-significant Group × Time effect for error rates, F(1,5) = 2.130, p = 0.091, [Formula: see text] = 0.036). Older adults revealed lower transfer costs for performance speed (significant Time × Group effect, e.g., simple sequence, F(1,2) = 10.511, p = 0.002, [Formula: see text] = 0.156). High participation in leisure time activities (β = - 0.58, p = 0.010, R DISCUSSION: Results confirmed impaired motor learning in older adults. Younger adults seem to show a better implicit knowledge of the practiced sequences compared to older adults. Regular participation in leisure time activities and cardiovascular fitness seem to prevent age-related decline and to facilitate motor sequence performance and motor sequence learning in older adults.

Indexed as

AgedAgingCardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaExerciseFemaleHumansLearningLeisure ActivitiesMaleMemory, Short-TermMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32617650
PMCPMC8286216
OpenAlexW3038674091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.