Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617635›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2020

A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience.

Osanna Yee Ki Wan, Annika Taithongchai, Susana I Veiga, Abdul H Sultan, Ranee Thakar

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Osanna Yee Ki WanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, London, CR7 7YE, UK.
Annika TaithongchaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, London, CR7 7YE, UK.
Susana I VeigaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, London, CR7 7YE, UK.
Abdul H SultanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, London, CR7 7YE, UK.
Ranee ThakarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, London, CR7 7YE, UK. ranee.thakar@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-141X
Croydon University Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe perineal clinic is a dedicated setting offering assessment for various childbirth-related presentations including obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), perineal wound complications, pelvic floor dysfunction and other conditions such as female genital mutilation(FGM). We describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of women from a tertiary perineal clinic based on data collected over an 11-year period.

methodsThis is a retrospective observational study. A one-stop outpatient service was offered to all women who sustained OASIs (postnatally and antenatally in a subsequent pregnancy), perineal complications (within 16 weeks postpartum), FGM and/or peripartum symptoms of urinary/anal incontinence or prolapse. Assessment included history with validated questionnaires, examination and anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound when appropriate. Outcomes were compared among different grades of OASIs. Management of each type of presentation was reported with outcomes.

resultsThere were 3254 first attendance episodes between 2006 and 2016. The majority (58.1%) were for OASIs, followed by perineal wound complications. Compared to the lower grades, the higher grades of OASI were associated with poorer outcomes in terms of symptoms, investigations and complications. Women with OASIs had unrelated symptoms such as urinary incontinence, perineal pain and wound infections that needed further intervention. A high proportion(42%) of wound complications required further specialist management.

conclusionWe describe a dedicated, one-stop perineal clinic model for antenatal and postnatal women for management of perineal and pelvic floor disorders. This comprehensive and novel data will enable clinicians to better counsel women regarding of outcomes after OASI and focus training to minimize risks of morbidities.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsAnal CanalDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPerineumPregnancyAnal incontinenceFemale genital mutilationObstetric anal sphincter injuriesPerineal clinicPerineal traumaPerineal wound complications

Identifiers

PMID32617635
PMCPMC7561568
OpenAlexW3038341108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.