ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
Evaluation of the Left Ventricular Hemodynamic Status of Double-Root Translocation Patients Through Vector Flow Mapping.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The double-root translocation (DRT) procedure is considered as a new choice for surgical management of complex congenital heart disease. Our study aims to investigate the left ventricular hemodynamic status after DRT by energy loss (EL), involving 42 patients who underwent DRT as well as 42 healthy volunteers as controls. The EL of left ventricle (LV) during different periods (rapid filling-RF, atrial contraction-AC, isovolumic contraction-IVC, rapid ejection-RE) of the same cardiac cycle were obtained and analyzed. Compared to the controls, global LV and apical three chamber-EL at AC and IVC periods in DRT group were higher (p < 0.05), and EL at RE period of DRT group was moderately lower. In the correlation analysis, the global EL at the RF was correlated with E wave (r = 0.47, p = 0.03), E/e' (r = 0.50, p = 0.02), BSA (r = - 0.54, p = 0.01), and age (r = - 0.67, p < 0.001). AC and RE- global EL were significantly correlated with E/e' (r = 0.49, r = 0.59, p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between E/e' and global EL at the IVC (r = 0.62, p = 0.003) and a moderate negative correlation with age (r = - 0.44, p = 0.04). The present study confirms that EL is a feasible and reproducible indicator for quantitatively evaluating LV hemodynamic status in patients who underwent DRT and reveals that DRT can lead to approximatively normal long-term hemodynamic performance of LV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.