Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617525›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2020

Achieving accurate estimates of fetal gestational age and personalised predictions of fetal growth based on data from an international prospective cohort study: a population-based machine learning study.

Russell Fung, Jose Villar, Ali Dashti, Leila Cheikh Ismail, Eleonora Staines-Urias, Eric O Ohuma, Laurent J Salomon, Cesar G Victora, Fernando C Barros, Ann Lambert and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predicting Fetal Growth with Curve Fitting and Machine Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 19 institutions in 13 countries.

Russell FungDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jose VillarNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ali DashtiDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Leila Cheikh IsmailNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eleonora Staines-UriasNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eric O OhumaNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Laurent J SalomonMaternité Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Cesar G VictoraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando C BarrosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Ann LambertNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maria CarvalhoFaculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Yasmin A JafferDepartment of Family & Community Health, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
J Alison NobleDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael G GravettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Manorama PurwarNagpur INTERGROWTH-21st Research Centre, Ketkar Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Ruyan PangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Enrico BertinoDipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche e dell' Adolescenza, Struttura Complessa Direzione Universitaria Neonatologia, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Shama MunimDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aung Myat MinShoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU), Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Rose McGreadyCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Shane A NorrisSouth African Medical Research Council Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen H KennedyNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aris T PapageorghiouNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abbas OurmazdDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st)
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAAga Khan University · PKPeking University · CNAga Khan University Nairobi · KEMahidol University · THMinistry of Health · OMShoklo Malaria Research Unit · THUniversity of Sharjah · AEUniversity of Turin · ITAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHospital for Sick Children · CAMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BR

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is a major global health challenge, the leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age, and a key measure of a population's general health and nutritional status. Current clinical methods of estimating fetal gestational age are often inaccurate. For example, between 20 and 30 weeks of gestation, the width of the 95% prediction interval around the actual gestational age is estimated to be 18-36 days, even when the best ultrasound estimates are used. The aims of this study are to improve estimates of fetal gestational age and provide personalised predictions of future growth. Methods: Using ultrasound-derived, fetal biometric data, we developed a machine learning approach to accurately estimate gestational age. The accuracy of the method is determined by reference to exactly known facts pertaining to each fetus-specifically, intervals between ultrasound visits-rather than the date of the mother's last menstrual period. The data stem from a sample of healthy, well-nourished participants in a large, multicentre, population-based study, the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). The generalisability of the algorithm is shown with data from a different and more heterogeneous population (INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study). Findings: In the context of two large datasets, we estimated gestational age between 20 and 30 weeks of gestation with 95% confidence to within 3 days, using measurements made in a 10-week window spanning the second and third trimesters. Fetal gestational age can thus be estimated in the 20-30 weeks gestational age window with a prediction interval 3-5 times better than with any previous algorithm. This will enable improved management of individual pregnancies. 6-week forecasts of the growth trajectory for a given fetus are accurate to within 7 days. This will help identify at-risk fetuses more accurately than currently possible. At population level, the higher accuracy is expected to improve fetal growth charts and population health assessments. Interpretation: Machine learning can circumvent long-standing limitations in determining fetal gestational age and future growth trajectory, without recourse to often inaccurately known information, such as the date of the mother's last menstrual period. Using this algorithm in clinical practice could facilitate the management of individual pregnancies and improve population-level health. Upon publication of this study, the algorithm for gestational age estimates will be provided for research purposes free of charge via a web portal. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Office of Science (US Department of Energy), US National Science Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyMachine LearningAlgorithmsBiometryFemaleFetal DevelopmentGestational AgeHumansInternationalityPregnancyProspective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32617525
PMCPMC7323599
OpenAlexW3038032928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.