Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617426›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational research2020

Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series.

Pierre Agnass, Eran van Veldhuisen, Jantien A Vogel, H Petra Kok, Mark J de Keijzer, Gerben Schooneveldt, Lianne R de Haan, John H Klaessens, Hester J Scheffer, Martijn R Meijerink and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Thermal side effects during pulsed field ablation: an analysis using computer modelling.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre AgnassDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eran van VeldhuisenDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jantien A VogelDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H Petra KokDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark J de KeijzerDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerben SchooneveldtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lianne R de HaanDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John H KlaessensDepartment of Clinical Physics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Hester J SchefferDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn R MeijerinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Krijn P van LiendenDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michal HegerDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes CrezeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUtrecht University · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFirst, the aim of the study was to determine whether irreversible electroporation (IRE) is associated with heat generation in the liver and pancreas at clinical (≤1,500 V/cm) and supraclinical (>1,500 V/cm) electroporation settings; second, to assess the risk of thermal tissue damage in and adjacent to the treated volume in highly perfused versus moderately perfused parts of both organs; third, to investigate the influence of perfusion and of the presence and the orientation of a metal stent on the maximal thermal elevation (ΔT

methodsThe aims were investigated in 12 case studies conducted in five female Landrace pigs. Several IRE settings were applied for lateral (2), triangular (3), and rectangular (4) electrode configurations in the liver hilum, liver periphery, pancreas head, and pancreas tail. IRE series of 10-90 pulses were applied with pulse durations that varied from 70 μs to 90 μs and electric field strengths between 1,200 V/cm and 3,000 V/cm. In select cases, a metal stent was positioned in the bile duct at the level of the liver hilum. Temperatures were measured before, during, and after IRE in and adjacent to the treatment volumes using fiber optical temperature probes (temperature at the nucleation centers) and digital thermography (surface temperature). The occurrence of thermal damage was assumed to be at temperatures above 50 °C (ΔT

resultsThe median baseline temperature was 31.6 °C-36.3 °C. ΔT

conclusionsDepending on IRE settings and tissue type, IRE is capable of inducing considerable heating in the liver and pancreas that is sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage. More significant temperature elevations are positively correlated with increasing number of electrode pairs, electric field strength, and pulse number. Temperature elevations can be further exacerbated by the presence and orientation of metal stents. Temperature elevations at the nucleation centers are not always reflected in the organ's surface temperature. Heat sink effects caused by large vessels were minimal in some instances, possibly due to reduced blood flow caused by anesthesia. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Appropriate IRE settings must be chosen based on the tissue type and the presence of stents to avoid thermal damage in healthy peritumoral tissue and to protect anatomical structures [Table: see text].

Indexed as

complicationsexperimental pig modelirreversible electroporationmicrowave ablationmild hyperthermianumerical treatment planningradiofrequency ablationtherapytissue ablation

Identifiers

PMID32617426
PMCPMC7326268
OpenAlexW3039848677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.