ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
Web-based study on Chinese dermatologists' attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements and challenges of artificial intelligence in dermatology: a review of applications and perspectives in China.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Surveying Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care in the United States: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring Attitudes Toward AI-Based Contactless Sensors in Health Among Five Stakeholder Groups: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: An International Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Attitudes Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Survey of Australian Dermatologists.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Views of Dermatologists, General Practitioners, and Melanographers on the Use of AI Tools in the Context of Good Decision-Making When Detecting Melanoma: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR dermatology · 2025Article
- Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of an Attitude toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (AIAS-4) among Peruvian Nurses.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Radiology Residents' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Towards successful implementation of artificial intelligence in skin cancer care: a qualitative study exploring the views of dermatologists and general practitioners.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Article
- Experiences Regarding Use and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Follow-Up of Atypical Moles at a Dermatological Outpatient Clinic: Qualitative Study.JMIR dermatology · 2023Article
- AI-Powered Diagnosis of Skin Cancer: A Contemporary Review, Open Challenges and Future Research Directions.Cancers · 2023Review
- Attitudes of optometrists towards artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinal disease: A cross-sectional mail-out survey.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022Article
- Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- International Teledermatology Review.Current dermatology reports · 2021Review
- Editorial: Progress and Prospects on Skin Imaging Technology, Teledermatology and Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Diagnostic capacity of skin tumor artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in real-world clinical settings.Chinese medical journal · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has become a powerful tool and is attracting more attention in the field of medicine. There are a number of AI studies focusing on skin diseases, and there are many AI products that have been applied in dermatology. However, the attitudes of dermatologists, specifically those from China, towards AI, is not clear as few, if any studies have focused on this issue.
methodsA web-based questionnaire was designed by experts from the Chinese Skin Image Database (CSID) and published on the UMER Doctor platform (an online learning platform for dermatologists developed by the Shanghai Wheat Color Intelligent Technology Company, China). A total of 1,228 Chinese dermatologists were recruited and provided answers to the questionnaire online. The differences of dermatologists' attitudes towards AI among the different groups (stratified by age, gender, hospital level, education degree, professional title, and hospital ownership) were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The correlations between stratified factors and dermatologists' attitudes towards AI were calculated by using the Spearman's rank correlation test. SPSS (version 22.0) was utilized for all analyses. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.
resultsA total of 1,228 Chinese dermatologists from 30 provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities, and other regions (including Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) participated in this survey. The dermatologists who participated acquired AI-related information mainly through the Internet, meetings or forums, and 70.51% of participated dermatologists acquired AI-related information by two or more approaches. In total, 99.51% of participated dermatologists pay attention (general, passive-active, and active attention) to information pertaining to AI. Stratified analyses revealed statistically significant differences in their attention levels (unconcerned, general, passive-active, and active attention) to AI-related information by gender, hospital level, education degree, and professional title (P values ≤1.79E-02). In total, 95.36% of the participated dermatologists thought the role of AI to be in "assisting the daily diagnosis and treatment activities for dermatologists". Stratified analyses about the thought of AI roles (unconcerned, useless, assist, and replace) showed that there was no statistically significant difference except for the hospital level (P value =4.09E-03). The correlations between stratified factors with attention levels and the opinions of AI roles showed extremely weak correlations. Furthermore, 64.17% of participated dermatologists thought secondary hospitals in China are in most need of the application AI, and 91.78% of participated dermatologists thought the priority implementation of AI should be in skin tumors.
conclusionsThe majority of Chinese dermatologists are interested in AI information and acquired information about AI through a variety of approaches. Nearly all dermatologists are attentive to information on AI and think the role of AI is in "assisting the daily diagnosis and treatment activities for dermatologists". Future AI implementation should be primarily focused on skin tumors and utilized in in secondary hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.