ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
Perioperative mannitol intensive use may avoid the early complication of cerebral venous sinus stenting.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting on correcting internal jugular vein and cerebral venous sinus stenosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Safety and efficacy comparison between OACs plus single antiplatelet and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with cerebral venous sinus stenosis poststenting.BMC neurology · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral venous sinus (CVS) stenting has been widely applied for correcting CVS stenosis. However, there are still some potential complications. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of perioperative management on avoiding complications of CVS stenting.
methodsPatients confirmed as CVS stenosis were enrolled from January 2014 through November 2019. All CVS stenosis were corrected by stenting when the trans-stenotic mean pressure gradient (MPG) was up to or over 8 mmHg. Patients were divided into perioperative management group and control group. Patients in the former group underwent transiently mannitol 250 mL intravenous infusion immediately prior to stenting besides routine ICP control. While patients in control group underwent the same routine treatment as in the perioperative management group. The clinical symptoms, intracranial pressure (ICP), and MPG of the patients were compared before and after stenting. In addition, the complications between the two groups were compared.
resultsA total of 81 eligible patients were finally enrolled in this study, including 64 females and 17 males, mean aged 45.35±13.83 years. After stenting, the stenotic CVS restored normal blood flow and MPG decreased significantly [10.0 (8.0-15.0)
conclusionsA transiently strict preoperative ICP control by mannitol may inhibit CVS stenting-related hemorrhage, which makes the stenting safer and more effective on correcting the CVS stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.