Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617248›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

Understanding the Fight Against Resistance: Hospital-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus vs. Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus.

Nicholas Tsouklidis, Rajat Kumar, Stacey E Heindl, Ravi Soni, Safeera Khan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The global epidemiology of MRSA.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Neonatal Osteomyelitis Caused byChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Staphylococcal Cassette ChromosomeAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Treatment of Methicillin-ResistantMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Methicillin-resistantVeterinary world · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas TsouklidisMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Rajat KumarOphthalmology, California Institute of Behavioural Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Stacey E HeindlMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ravi SoniNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Safeera KhanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Cincinnati Health Department · USAtlantic University · USCalifornia Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the identification of Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, penicillin was exclusively used to combat its disastrous toxic effects. Shortly thereafter, resistant strains arose, which were no longer susceptible to penicillin or methicillin treatments. These strands were later identified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Two particular MRSA strands that are discussed below are the hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) strands and the community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) strands. Despite arising from a single bacterium, S. aureus, each of these two strands possesses quite different resistance and virulence factors. These differences contribute to the type of population in which they affect, their ability to resist traditional treatment approaches, and their overall morbidity and mortality rates. We explore these differences by reviewing several review articles published on various reputable scientific online databases. Findings include sources from studies conducted in the United States, China, Nepal, and Uganda, ranging from 2006 to 2019. These resistance and virulence factors, the Staphylococcal cassette cartridge mecA resistance gene (SCCmec) and the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin toxin gene (PVL), were identified and isolated in each of these studies in order to appreciate similarities and differences in how they impact human beings.

Indexed as

ca-mrsacommunity acquired mrsaha-mrsahospital acquired mrsamrsa prevalencepvl generesistancesccmecstaphylococcusstaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID32617248
PMCPMC7325383
OpenAlexW3037512593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.