Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617190›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

An eye for a tooth:

Christine M Janis, Borja Figueirido, Larisa DeSantis, Stephan Lautenschlager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Hypercanines: Not just for sabertooths.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Who was the real sabertooth predator: Thylacosmilus or Thylacoleo?Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Sharpening our understanding of saber-tooth biomechanics.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine M JanisSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Borja FigueiridoDepartamento de Ecología y Geología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Larisa DeSantisDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Stephan LautenschlagerSchool of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Brown University · USUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversity of Birmingham · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaber-toothed mammals, now all extinct, were cats or "cat-like" forms with enlarged, blade-like upper canines, proposed as specialists in taking large prey. During the last 66 Ma, the saber-tooth ecomorph has evolved convergently at least in five different mammalian lineages across both marsupials and placentals. Indeed,

methodsHere we follow a multi-proxy approach using canonical correspondence analysis of discrete traits, biomechanical models of skull function using Finite Element Analysis, and 3D dental microwear texture analysis of upper and lower postcanine teeth, to investigate the degree of evolutionary convergence between

resultsCorrespondence analysis shows that the craniodental features of

conclusionsOur results indicate that despite its impressive canines, the "marsupial saber-tooth" was not the ecological analogue of placental saber-tooths, and likely did not use its canines to dispatch its prey. This oft-cited example of convergence requires reconsideration, and

Indexed as

Canonical correspondence analysisComputational modellingDental microwear texture analysisEvolutionFinite element analysisFossilPalaeobiologySaber-tooth ecomorphologyVertebrate palaeontology

Identifiers

PMID32617190
PMCPMC7323715
OpenAlexW3037195328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.