Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32617125›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2020

Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Jin Hyuk Jang, Woo Yong Lee, Jong Woo Kim, Kyoung Rai Cho, Sang Hyun Nam, YongBum Park

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Application value of Ultrasound-Guided cervical nerve root block test before percutaneous nucleoplasty in the treatment of patients with cervical chest pain: A retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin Hyuk JangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo Yong LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Woo KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Rai ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hyun NamDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
YongBum ParkDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8288-9450
Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, ultrasound- (US-) guided selective nerve root block (SNRB) has been reported to have similar effects compared to fluoroscopy- (FL-) guided cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI). There is no published study comparing the therapeutic efficacy and safety of interlaminar- (IL-) CESI and transforaminal- (TF-) CESI with US-guided SNRB. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the mid-term effects and advantages of the US-guided SNRB, FL-guided IL-CESI, and TF-CESI for radicular pain in the lower cervical spine through assessment of pain relief and functional improvement. Methods: Patients with radicular pain in the lower cervical spine who received guided SNRB ( Results: Both the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) scores showed improvements at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection in all groups, with no significant differences between groups ( Conclusions: Our results suggest that, compared with FL-guided IL and TF-CESI, US-guided SNRB has a low intravascular injection rate; it is unlikely that serious complications will occur. Also, US-guided SNRB requires a shorter administration duration while providing similar pain relief and functional improvements. Therefore, for the treatment of patients with lower cervical radicular pain, US-guided SNRB should be considered as a prior epidural steroid injection.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesia, EpiduralCervical VertebraeFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInjections, EpiduralMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockNeuralgiaPain ManagementRadiculopathyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID32617125
PMCPMC7306851
OpenAlexW3035093753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.